Cited by 17Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchGeriatric Care and Nursing HomesAging, Elder Care, and Social Issues

The Canadian dementia challenge: Ensuring optimal care and services for those at risk or with dementia throughout the country

Open access
Feldman, Howard H., Estabrooks, Carole A.·2017·Canadian Journal of Public Health

Abstract

In the next 15 years, Canada is predicted to face a doubling in its population affected by dementia. By 2038, an estimated 1.1 million Canadians will be experiencing dementia, with unprecedented impact on social, economic and health landscapes. In September 2015, the Canadian Academy of Health Sciences convened a Forum, with the specific thematic goals of reviewing progress towards effective dementia treatment and prevention, improved systems of care, advanced living and built environments, and impactful technology developments. The orientation of the Forum was to focus on potential solutions and advances in these areas. These areas are integral to the goal of a national end-to-end program, where all affected Canadians can be optimally supported in their communities and receive quality of care - regardless of where they live or who they are.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.17269/cjph.108.5852

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Feldman, H. H., & Estabrooks, C. A.
Affiliations
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
  • University of Alberta (CA)
Corresponding author
Feldman, Howard H.
Venue
Canadian Journal of Public Health
Published
2017-01
Volume
108
Issue
1
Pages
e95-e97
ISSN
  • 0008-4263 (ISSN-L)
  • 1920-7476
OpenAlex
W2605673031
Cited by
17
References
13
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2
FWCI
2.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Canadian Journal of Public Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Eli Lilly and Company
  • Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada
  • Biogen
  • Research Manitoba
  • Ontario Brain Institute
  • McMaster University
  • Public Health Agency of Canada
  • Providence Health Care
  • Alzheimer's Society
  • College of Family Physicians of Canada
  • Ontario Neurotrauma Foundation
  • Alzheimer Society
  • Nova Scotia Health Research Foundation
  • Michael Smith Health Research BC
  • Public Health Agency
  • Eisai
  • Genentech
  • University of California, San Diego
  • Tau Consortium
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  • National Institute on Aging
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Aging, Elder Care, and Social Issues
Keywords
dementia, dementia prevention, quality of care, built environment, assistive technology, National Dementia Strategy, population projections, community-based support, Canada
MeSH terms
Aged, Canada, Dementia, Humans, Middle Aged, Quality of Health Care, Risk Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review