Cited by 11Data-Driven Disease SurveillanceSocial Media in Health EducationTravel-related health issues

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Comparing Twitter data to routine data sources in public health surveillance for the 2015 Pan/Parapan American Games: an ecological study

Open access
Khan, Yasmin, Leung, Garvin J., Belanger, Paul, Gournis, Effie, Buckeridge, David L., Liu, Li, Li, Ye, Johnson, Ian L.·2018·Canadian Journal of Public Health

Abstract

Objectives This study examined Twitter for public health surveillance during a mass gathering in Canada with two objectives: to explore the feasibility of acquiring, categorizing and using geolocated Twitter data and to compare Twitter data against other data sources used for Pan Parapan American Games (P/PAG) surveillance.Methods Syndrome definitions were created using keyword categorization to extract posts from Twitter. Categories were developed iteratively for four relevant syndromes: respiratory, gastrointestinal, heat-related illness, and influenza-like illness (ILI). All data sources corresponded to the location of Toronto, Canada. Twitter data were acquired from a publicly available stream representing a 1% random sample of tweets from June 26 to September 10, 2015. Cross-correlation analyses of time series data were conducted between Twitter and comparator surveillance data sources: emergency department visits, telephone helpline calls, laboratory testing positivity rate, reportable disease data, and temperature.Results The frequency of daily tweets that were classified into syndromes was low, with the highest mean number of daily tweets being for ILI and respiratory syndromes (22.0 and 21.6, respectively) and the lowest, for the heat syndrome (4.1). Cross-correlation analyses of Twitter data demonstrated significant correlations for heat syndrome with two data sources: telephone helpline calls (r = 0.4) and temperature data (r = 0.5).Conclusion Using simple syndromes based on keyword classification of geolocated tweets, we found a correlation between tweets and two routine data sources for heat alerts, the only public health event detected during P/PAG. Further research is needed to understand the role for Twitter in surveillance.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.17269/s41997-018-0059-0

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Citron, C., & Khan, Y. (2013). Hazard identification and risk assessment for the 2015 Pan and Para Pan American Games: communicable and infectious diseases. Queen's Printer for Ontario: Toronto.
  2. Elasticsearch. (2017). Elasticsearch. Mountain View: Elasticsearch BV Available from: https://www.elastic.co/products/elasticsearch. Accessed August 29, 2017.
  3. Government of Ontario. (2014). Get medical advice: Telehealth Ontario. Toronto: Queen's Printer for Ontario Available from: https://www.ontario.ca/page/get-medical-advice-telehealth-ontario. Accessed August 29, 2017.
  4. Morstatter, F., Pfeffer, J., Liu, H., & Carley, K. M. (2013). Is the sample good enough? Comparing data from Twitter’s streaming API with Twitter’s firehose. arXiv:1306.5204 preprint. · arXiv
  5. Ontario Agency for Health Protection and Promotion (Public Health Ontario). (2015). 2015 Pan Am/Parapan Am Games (P/PAG): PHO surveillance report—final summary. Toronto: Queen's Printer for Ontario.
  6. The Toronto Organizing Committee for the 2015 Pan American and Parapan American Games. (2015). Toronto 2015 Pan Am/Parapan Am Games. Toronto: The Toronto Organizing Committee for the 2015 Pan American and Parapan American Games Available from: http://www.toronto2015.org/. Accessed December 22, 2016.
  7. World Health Organization. (2015). Public health for mass gatherings: key considerations. Geneva: World Health Organization.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Khan, Y., Leung, G. J., Belanger, P., Gournis, E., Buckeridge, D. L., Liu, L., Li, Y., & Johnson, I. L.
Affiliations
  • University Health Network (CA)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • Toronto Public Health (CA)
  • McGill University (CA)
  • KFL&A Public Health (CA)
Corresponding author
Khan, Yasmin
Venue
Canadian Journal of Public Health
Published
2018-04-20
Volume
109
Issue
3
Pages
419-426
ISSN
  • 0008-4263 (ISSN-L)
  • 1920-7476
OpenAlex
W2802776178
Cited by
11
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3
FWCI
1.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Canadian Journal of Public Health (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Data-Driven Disease Surveillance
  • Social Sciences › Health › Social Media in Health Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Travel-related health issues
Keywords
Twitter, social media surveillance, disease surveillance, mass gatherings, heat-related illness, heat alerts, influenza-like illness, respiratory syndrome, gastrointestinal syndrome, geo-tagged tweets, emergency department visits
MeSH terms
Canada, Crowding, Feasibility Studies, Humans, Sports, Social Media, Public Health Surveillance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review