The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Routing Metrics Used for Path Calculation in Low-Power and Lossy Networks
Abstract
Low-Power and Lossy Networks (LLNs) have unique characteristics compared with traditional wired and ad hoc networks that require the specification of new routing metrics and constraints.By contrast, with typical Interior Gateway Protocol (IGP) routing metrics using hop counts or link metrics, this document specifies a set of link and node routing metrics and constraints suitable to LLNs to be used by the Routing Protocol for Low-Power and Lossy Networks (RPL).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
RPL: IPv6 Routing Protocol for Low-Power and Lossy Networks
Brandt, A., Hui, J., Kelsey, R., Levis, P., Pister, K., Struik, R., Vasseur, J., & Alexander, R. (2012) · doi:10.17487/rfc6550 · Cited by 2,662
Self-citationPerformance analysis of the RPL Routing Protocol
Accettura, N., Grieco, L. A., Boggia, G., & Camarda, P. (2011) · 2011 IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics · doi:10.1109/icmech.2011.5971218 · Cited by 346
Ghaleb, B., Al-Dubai, A. Y., Ekonomou, E., Alsarhan, A., Nasser, Y., Mackenzie, L. M., & Boukerche, A. (2019) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2018.2874356 · Cited by 333
Gaddour, O., & Koubâa, A. (2012) · Computer Networks · doi:10.1016/j.comnet.2012.06.016 · Cited by 323
Internet of multimedia things: Vision and challenges
Alvi, S. A., Afzal, B., Shah, G. A., Atzori, L., & Mahmood, W. (2015) · Ad Hoc Networks · doi:10.1016/j.adhoc.2015.04.006 · Cited by 241
Metadata
- Authors
- Pister, K., Dejean, N., & Barthel, D.
- Publisher
- RFC Editor
- Published
- 2012-03
- OpenAlex
- W2122682296
- Cited by
- 376
- References
- 0
- Type
- report
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Routing Metrics Used for Path Calculation in Low-Power and Lossy Networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.17487/rfc6551
- The paper
- Pister, K., Dejean, N., & Barthel, D. (2012). Routing Metrics Used for Path Calculation in Low-Power and Lossy Networks. https://doi.org/10.17487/rfc6551
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
