The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Performance analysis of the RPL Routing Protocol
Abstract
The IETF Routing Over Low-power and Lossy Networks working group has recently proposed the IPv6 Routing Protocol for Low power and Lossy Networks, i.e., the RPL protocol. It has been designed to face the typical requirements of wireless sensor networks. Given its relevance in the industrial and scientific communities, this paper presents a performance analysis of RPL based on simulations. Our results clearly show that RPL can ensure a very fast network set-up, thus allowing the development of advanced monitoring applications also in critical conditions. On the other hand, we found that further research is required to optimize the RPL signaling in order to decrease the protocol overhead.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Wireless sensor network survey
Yick, J., Mukherjee, B., & Ghosal, D. (2008) · Computer Networks · doi:10.1016/j.comnet.2008.04.002 · Cited by 6,255
RPL: IPv6 Routing Protocol for Low-Power and Lossy Networks
Brandt, A., Hui, J., Kelsey, R., Levis, P., Pister, K., Struik, R., Vasseur, J., & Alexander, R. (2012) · doi:10.17487/rfc6550 · Cited by 2,662
Cross-Level Sensor Network Simulation with COOJA
Osterlind, F., Dunkels, A., Eriksson, J., Finne, N., & Voigt, T. (2006) · Proceedings. 2006 31st IEEE Conference on Local Computer Networks · doi:10.1109/lcn.2006.322172 · Cited by 1,053
RPL: IPv6 Routing Protocol for Low power and Lossy Networks
Kuryla, S. (2010) · Cited by 832
MAC Essentials for Wireless Sensor Networks
Bachir, A., Dohler, M., Watteyne, T., & Leung, K. K. (2010) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/surv.2010.020510.00058 · Cited by 523
Levis, P., Clausen, T., Hui, J., Gnawali, O., & Ko, J. (2011) · doi:10.17487/rfc6206 · Cited by 457
Routing Metrics Used for Path Calculation in Low-Power and Lossy Networks
Pister, K., Dejean, N., & Barthel, D. (2012) · doi:10.17487/rfc6551 · Cited by 376
Performance study of IEEE 802.15.4 using measurements and simulations
Petrova, M., Riihijärvi, J., Mähönen, P., et al. (2006) · doi:10.1109/wcnc.2006.1683512 · Cited by 310
Industrial Routing Requirements in Low-Power and Lossy Networks
Dwars, S., & Phinney, T. (2009) · doi:10.17487/rfc5673 · Cited by 243
Routing Requirements for Urban Low-Power and Lossy Networks
(2009) · doi:10.17487/rfc5548 · Cited by 232
Cited by
Internet of Things: A Survey on Enabling Technologies, Protocols, and Applications
Al-Fuqaha, A., Guizani, M., Mohammadi, M., Aledhari, M., & Ayyash, M. (2015) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2015.2444095 · Cited by 8,630
(1996) · Institutional Research Information System University of Turin (University of Turin) · doi:10.1111/j · Cited by 5,486
Gaddour, O., & Koubâa, A. (2012) · Computer Networks · doi:10.1016/j.comnet.2012.06.016 · Cited by 323
Fog/Edge Computing-Based IoT (FECIoT): Architecture, Applications, and Research Issues
Omoniwa, B., Hussain, R., Javed, M. A., Bouk, S. H., & Malik, S. A. (2019) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2018.2875544 · Cited by 284
IETF Standardization in the Field of the Internet of Things (IoT): A Survey
Ishaq, I., Carels, D., Teklemariam, G., Hoebeke, J., Abeele, F., Poorter, E., Moerman, I., & Demeester, P. (2013) · Journal of Sensor and Actuator Networks · doi:10.3390/jsan2020235 · Cited by 226
Metadata
- Authors
- Accettura, N., Grieco, L. A., Boggia, G., & Camarda, P.
- Venue
- 2011 IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2011-04
- Pages
- 767-772
- OpenAlex
- W2154478511
- Cited by
- 346
- References
- 14
- FWCI
- 20.57
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Performance analysis of the RPL Routing Protocol. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/icmech.2011.5971218
- The paper
- Accettura, N., Grieco, L. A., Boggia, G., & Camarda, P. (2011). Performance analysis of the RPL Routing Protocol. 2011 IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics. https://doi.org/10.1109/icmech.2011.5971218
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
