Cited by 378Cryptography and Data SecurityWeb Application Security VulnerabilitiesAdvanced Authentication Protocols Security

Certificate transparency

Laurie, B., Langley, A., Kasper, E.·2013

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.17487/rfc6962

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In addition, while DPKI systems offer a transparent and open architecture, the CAs in the traditional PKI model have also taken steps towards better transparency by offering services such as certificate transparency logs.

    “In addition, while DPKI systems offer a transparent and open architecture, the CAs in the traditional PKI model have also taken steps towards better transparency by offering services such as certificate t ransparency l ogs [95], through which all issued certificates are published on the CA website.”

    From A Survey of Self-Sovereign Identity Ecosystem (2021) · cites this paper as [95]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Laurie, B., Langley, A., & Kasper, E.
Publisher
RFC Editor
Published
2013-06
OpenAlex
W4233819588
Cited by
378
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 42 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 45 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 40 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
Type
report
Language
en
Open access
closed
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Cryptography and Data Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Web Application Security Vulnerabilities
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Advanced Authentication Protocols Security
Keywords
certificate transparency, digital certificates, public key infrastructure, certificate revocation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review