Cited by 22Artificial Intelligence in EducationEnglish Language Learning and TeachingEducational Technology and Pedagogy

Artificial Intelligence for English Language Learning and Teaching: Advancing Sustainable Development Goals

Open access
Al-Smadi, Omar Ali, Rashid, Radzuwan Ab, Saad, Hadeel, Zrekat, Yousef Houssni, Kamal, Siti Soraya Lin Abdullah, Uktamovich, Gaforov Ikboljon·2024·Journal of Language Teaching and Research

Abstract

This study explores the affordance of Artificial Intelligence (AI) to English language learning and teaching, focusing on its alignment with the United Nations' Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). It aims to investigate the role of AI in enhancing language education and fostering student-centered learning. Data for this study were collected through semi-structured interviews with 18 English teachers to gather qualitative insights into their experiences with AI-powered language learning tools. The findings reveal that the teachers have positive appraisals of AI that its use has six major impacts: i) enhancing the personalization of learning; ii) contributing to improved learning outcomes by advancing students' speaking, listening, reading, and writing skills; iii) playing a fundamental role in bridging educational gaps; iv) enhancing students’ engagement and motivation; v) empowering educators with professional development opportunities; vi) and encouraging self-directed learning. This study argues that, if implemented thoughtfully, AI can enhance language learning outcomes and create an environment conducive to student engagement and success.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.17507/jltr.1506.09

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Perception-based research among Saudi students and faculty consistently highlights a fundamental ambivalence: AI tools are valued for efficiency and linguistic support, yet perceived as a threat to authentic learning, independent thinking, and ethical academic practice.

    “At the same time, perception-based research among Saudi students and faculty consistently highlights a fundamental ambivalence: AI tools are valued for their efficiency and linguistic support functions, yet they are simultaneously perceived as a threat to authentic learning, independent thinking, and ethical academic practice (Aladsani, 2024; Aldossary et al., 2024; Al-Smadi et al., 2024; Aluthman”

    From From tool to scaffold: structured human–AI collaboration and its effects on academic writing and digital critical thinking among Saudi EFL learners (2026) · cites this paper as Al-Smadi et al., 2024

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Al-Smadi, O. A., Rashid, R.A., & Altamimi, D.H. (2020). A linguistic ethnography of teacher talk in an English for Medical Purposes Classroom. International Journal of Arabic-English Studies, 20(1), 51-66. DOI: 10.6007/ijarped/v6-i3/3169 · DOI
  2. Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2015). Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation. San Francisco, CA: Wiley.
  3. Radzuwan Ab Rashid is an Associate Professor in the Faculty of Languages and Communication, Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin, Malaysia. He obtained his PhD in Education from the University of Nottingham, United Kingdom and he completed his postdoctoral fellowship at the University of Leeds exploring Applied Linguistics in an educational context. His research interests include teacher education and professional development, and contemporary discourse in online settings. He is the Editor-in-Chief of Journal of Nusantara Studies (Jonus), a social science journal indexed in the Web of Science. He has had research articles published in Discourse Studies, Discourse & Society, Policy Futures in Education and many other Scopus and WoS journals. In 2019, Clarivate Analytics (Web of Science) nominated him for the Malaysia Research Star Award in the category Research and Innovation Excellence, Researcher in Arts and Applied Arts.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Al-Smadi, O. A., Rashid, R. A., Saad, H., Zrekat, Y. H., Kamal, S. S. L. A., & Uktamovich, G. I.
Affiliations
  • Sultan Zainal Abidin University (MY)
  • Applied Science Private University (JO)
  • Arab Open University (OM)
  • Universiti Sains Malaysia (MY)
  • Ferghana State University (UZ)
Venue
Journal of Language Teaching and Research
Published
2024-11-01
Volume
15
Issue
6
Pages
1835-1844
ISSN
  • 1798-4769 (ISSN-L)
  • 2053-0684
OpenAlex
W4403987666
Cited by
22
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 7
FWCI
8.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Journal of Language Teaching and Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › English Language Learning and Teaching
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Educational Technology and Pedagogy
Keywords
artificial intelligence in education, English language teaching, English language learning, Sustainable Development Goals, teacher perceptions, personalized learning, student engagement, student motivation, self-directed learning, educational technology, teacher professional development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review