The DOI matches its Crossref record.
PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL POLITICS AND EMPLOYEES’ PERFORMANCE IN DISTINCTIVE ECONOMIES
Open accessOverview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Interestingly, the funnel approach, previously used by researchers [52-54,60], found that high environmentalists despite their claim for being highly skeptical, most frequently fall into the trap of identifying greenwashing products as sustainable.”
From Are You Environmentally Conscious Enough to Differentiate between Greenwashed and Sustainable Items? A Global Consumers Perspective (2020) · cites this paper as [52]
In the citing paper
“The values of HTMT less than 1 reflect the constructs that have acceptable external validity [52,53,55].”
From Are You Environmentally Conscious Enough to Differentiate between Greenwashed and Sustainable Items? A Global Consumers Perspective (2020) · cites this paper as [52]
In the citing paper
“Furthermore, Average Variance Extracted (AVE) obtained values greater than 0.5 reflects the validity of the scale's internal consistency [52].”
From Are You Environmentally Conscious Enough to Differentiate between Greenwashed and Sustainable Items? A Global Consumers Perspective (2020) · cites this paper as [52]
In the citing paper
“In the present study, all three criteria were found to be acceptable as Cronbach alpha and composite reliability were greater than 0.7 while AVE was greater than 0.5 in all three countries (Table 1, Figures 2-4).”
From Are You Environmentally Conscious Enough to Differentiate between Greenwashed and Sustainable Items? A Global Consumers Perspective (2020) · cites this paper as [52]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Urbański, M., & ul Haque, A. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12051786 · Cited by 153
Metadata
- Authors
- Imran, M., Haque, A. U., & Rębilas, R.
- Venue
- Polish Journal of Management Studies
- Publisher
- Czestochowa University of Technology
- Published
- 2018-12
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 135-150
- ISSN
- 2081-7452 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2909356939
- Cited by
- 34
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4
- FWCI
- 13.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- Polish Journal of Management Studies (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Employee Performance and Management
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Employee Performance and Motivation
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
- Keywords
- performance evaluation (human resources), employee performance
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
