The DOI matches its Crossref record.
MANAGEMENT AND ADMINISTRATIVE INSIGHT FOR THE UNIVERSITIES: HIGH STRESS, LOW SATISFACTION AND NO COMMITMENT
Open accessAbstract
This comparative study examines the moderating effect of occupational stress (OS) on the job satisfaction (JS) and organisational commitment (OC) of the university personnel in the United Kingdom (UK) and Pakistan with an attempt to provide managerial implications to managers, administrators and supervisors. To do this, the study initially employed probability and non-probability sampling techniques in order to reach 308 respondents determined through the margin of error (M.E) while effectively using referrals, networks, and gatekeepers to circulate the questionnaire. Then, the structural equation modeling (SEM) method has been used as a quantitative approach. The reported results show that the relationship between job satisfaction and organisational commitment differ for the university (teaching and non-teaching) staff in the UK (advanced economy) and Pakistan (emerging economy). The job satisfaction affects organisational commitment significantly in Pakistan while the non-significant impact is found in the UK. Moreover, the occupational stress significantly moderates the relationship between JS and OC in Pakistan whereas non-significant moderating effect reported is in the UK. Based on the analysis, different managerial implications are proposed to reduce occupational stress, increase job satisfaction and maintain higher organisational commitment, which in turn, improve organisational performance.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The greater value or equal to 0.7 for Cronbach's alpha and composite reliability is acceptable in social science studies [51].”
From Are You Environmentally Conscious Enough to Differentiate between Greenwashed and Sustainable Items? A Global Consumers Perspective (2020) · cites this paper as [51]
In the citing paper
“In the present study, all three criteria were found to be acceptable as Cronbach alpha and composite reliability were greater than 0.7 while AVE was greater than 0.5 in all three countries (Table 1, Figures 2-4).”
From Are You Environmentally Conscious Enough to Differentiate between Greenwashed and Sustainable Items? A Global Consumers Perspective (2020) · cites this paper as [51]
In the citing paper
“A plethora of research has confirmed that a comparative strategy is e ective in attaining global perspective; Haque Nair Kuckultan [51], Haque et al. [53], Kot et al. [50], and Kot et al. [54].”
From Are You Environmentally Conscious Enough to Differentiate between Greenwashed and Sustainable Items? A Global Consumers Perspective (2020) · cites this paper as [51]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Urbański, M., & ul Haque, A. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12051786 · Cited by 153
Metadata
- Authors
- ul Haque, A., Nair, S. L. S., & Kucukaltan, B.
- Venue
- Polish Journal of Management Studies
- Publisher
- Czestochowa University of Technology
- Published
- 2019-12
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 236-255
- ISSN
- 2081-7452 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3149279635
- Cited by
- 52
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 7
- FWCI
- 10.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- Polish Journal of Management Studies (publishedVersion)
- Trakya University's Institutional Open Access System (Trakya University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Employee Performance and Management
- Keywords
- university administration, administrative management, job satisfaction, organizational commitment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review