Cited by 25Nursing care and researchPsychometric Methodologies and TestingIntergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving

Escala de sobrecarga del cuidador Zarit: estructura factorial en cuidadores informales de Bucaramanga

Open access
Albarracín Rodríguez, Ángela Pilar, Cerquera Córdoba, Ara Mercedes, Pabón Poches, Daysy Katherine·2016·Revista de Psicología Universidad de Antioquia

Abstract

El estudio de la sobrecarga en cuidadores primarios informales ha tomado gran relevancia en Colombia a causa del progresivo envejecimiento poblacional. Este estudio de tipo instrumental examinó la estructura factorial y confiabilidad de la Escala de Sobrecarga del Cuidador de Zarit. La muestra estuvo conformada por 100 cuidadores (Edad promedio = 45,72 años, DE = 16,68), a quienes se les aplicó una entrevista estructurada y la Escala Zarit. El análisis factorial exploratorio evidenció cuatro factores que explican el 68,35% de la varianza total, obteniendo un alto nivel de fiabilidad para la Escala Total (α = 0,88), demostrando que la Escala Zarit es un instrumento multidimensional, útil para medir sobrecarga en cuidadores primarios informales de adultos mayores dependientes de la región.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.17533/udea.rpsua.v8n2a06

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Zarit Burden Interview has construct validity in Colombia by varimax rotation explaining 68% of variance and Cronbach's alpha reliability of 0.88.

    “Este instrumento cuenta con pruebas psicométricas en Colombia, con una validez de constructo por rotación varimax que explica el 68% de la varianza y una confiabilidad con alfa de Cronbach de 0.88 16,17 .”

    From Sobrecarga y calidad de vida de cuidadores de personas con cáncer en cuidados paliativos (2021) · cites this paper as [17]

    The indexed passages are from a Villavicencio hemodialysis-caregiver study, not the cited Bucaramanga psychometric study; its References section merely lists the cited paper. Searches for varimax rotation, 68% explained variance, and Cronbach’s alpha of 0.88 returned no passage reporting those results, so the claim cannot be checked against the available copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Contreras Montalvo S, Vargas Mendoza J. Sobrecarga emocional en los cuidadores de pacientes que reciben el tratamiento de hemodiálisis [Internet]. e_Magazine CONDUCTITLAN, 2019,Vol.4, No.1, 1-8 [citado 15 Junio 2019];4(1)1-8.Disponible en: http://www.conductitlan.org.mx/20_e-Magazine/MATERIALES/Contreras_&_Vargas_2017.pdf
  2. Albarracín Rodríguez, A. P., Cerquera Córdoba, A. M. y Pabón Poches, D. K. (2016). Escala de sobrecarga del cuidador Zarit: estructura factorial en cuidadores informales de Bucaramanga. Revista de Psicología Universidad de Antioquia, 8(2), 87-99. DOI: 10.17533/udea.rpsua.v8n2a06
  3. Aguilera Flórez A, Castrillo Cineira E, Linares Fano B, Carnero García R, Alonso Rojo A, López Robles P et al. Análisis del perfil y la sobrecarga del cuidador de pacientes en Diálisis Peritoneal y Hemodiálisis [Internet]. Enferm Nefrol 2016: octubre- diciembre; 19 (4): 359/365 Scielo. [citado 16 Junio 2019]. Disponible en: http://scielo.isciii.es/pdf/enefro/v19n4/07_original4.pdf
  4. Arroyo Priego, Arana Ruiz, Garrido Blanco, Crespo Montero et al. Análisis de la sobrecarga del cuidador del paciente en diálisis [Internet] Enferm Nefrol. 2018 Jul-Sep;21(3):213-24. [citado 25 Octubre 2019];4(1)1-8.Disponible en:http://scielo.isciii.es/pdf/enefro/v21n3/2255-3517-enefro-21-03-213.pdf

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Albarracín Rodríguez, Á. P., Cerquera Córdoba, A. M., & Pabón Poches, D. K.
Venue
Revista de Psicología Universidad de Antioquia
Published
2016-12-30
Volume
8
Issue
2
Pages
87-99
ISSN
  • 2145-4892 (ISSN-L)
  • 2256-1102
OpenAlex
W2732923153
Cited by
25
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
es
Open access
Locations
  • Revista de Psicología Universidad de Antioquia (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Repositorio Universidad de los Llanos (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
Keywords
Zarit Burden Interview, caregiver burden, informal caregivers, primary caregivers, factor structure, scale reliability, dependent elderly, population aging, Bucaramanga

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review