Cited by 5Fuel Cells and Related MaterialsElectrocatalysts for Energy ConversionAdvancements in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells

Membrane Electrode Assembly with High Efficiency and Stability: Effect of Solvent Type and Membrane Composition

Open access
Sabli, N., Abu Bakar, N.A., Izhar, S., Hilal, H.S.·2019·Sains Malaysiana

Abstract

Membrane electrode assembly (MEA) method is being widely considered in proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) preparation.This work describes for the first time how PEMFC performance can be enhanced, while using relatively low temperature processing for the MEA, by choosing the suitable solvent and suitable ionomer (nafion) content.Three dispersion solvents (water, ethylene glycol and ethanol) have been examined here, and ethanol (with lowest boiling point) showed best PEMFC performance.In addition to its non-hazardous nature, the low boiling point ethanol allowed manufacturing the working membrane at 130°C or lower besides using a safe solvent to use.In each solvent system, different nafion concentrations were used (10%, 20% and 30%).The 30% nafion concentration in ethanol showed highest performance (Open circuit potential of 0.88 V and output working potential of 0.67 V at 20 mA/cm 2 current density) among the series.The anode and cathode, of the MEA, were both fabricated using same catalyst material (Platinum) and same nafion sheet thickness (50 µm).The spray method was employed.The electrochemical performance for the prepared MEA fuel cells was assessed by linear sweep voltammetry to evaluate the open circuit voltage.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.17576/jsm-2019-4804-20

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • High boiling point solvents require higher temperatures for drying, present higher toxicity, and lead to severe swelling of the proton exchange membrane.

    “However, high boiling point solvents require higher temperatures for drying, presenting higher toxicity and leading to severe swelling of the PEM [178].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sabli, N., Abu Bakar, N. A., Izhar, S., & Hilal, H. S.
Affiliations
  • Universiti Putra Malaysia (MY)
  • An-Najah National University (PS)
Venue
Sains Malaysiana
Published
2019-04-30
Volume
48
Issue
4
Pages
877-885
ISSN
0126-6039 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2944667703
Cited by
5
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1
FWCI
0.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sains Malaysiana (publishedVersion)
  • Universiti Putra Malaysia Institutional Repository (Universiti Putra Malaysia) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Fuel Cells and Related Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Advancements in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells
Keywords
membrane electrode assembly, proton exchange membrane fuel cells, ethanol, ethylene glycol, low-temperature processing, spray coating, open-circuit voltage, fuel cell performance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review