Cited by 73Gender Studies in LanguageMedia, Gender, and AdvertisingGender, Sexuality, and Education

A critical discourse analysis of gender representations in the content of 5th grade English Language textbook

Open access
Ahmad, Muhammad, Shah, Syed Kazim·2019·International and Multidisciplinary Journal of Social Sciences

Abstract

This study investigates gender representation in an English language textbook taught to the students of Grade-5 in public and private schools in Punjab (Pakistan) by applying Fairclough’s three-dimensional model. For this purpose, content and critical discourse analyses approaches were applied to check eight-factor gender discrimination in the said textbook. As a result, it was observed that the said textbook was highly gender biased which represented males more than females. It also appeared that the said textbook had been designed to maintain male dominance in implicit as well as explicit ways. Such state of affairs may lead to gender discrimination in practical lives. Therefore, the study suggests that both genders should be represented in an equalized proportion. This can be achieved by increasing the number of female authors and sensitizing the teachers about gender discrimination and asking them to highlight gender biased issues in education.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.17583/rimcis.2019.3989

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 48

  1. Amerian, M., & Esmaili, F. (2015). Language and gender: A critical discourse analysis on gender representation in a series of international ELT textbooks. International Journal of Research Studies in Education, 4(2), 3-12. doi: 10.5861/ijrse.2014.963 · DOI
  2. Amini, M., & Birjandi, P. (2012). Gender bias in the Iranian high school EFL textbooks. English Language Teaching, 5(2), 134-147. doi: 10.5539/elt. · DOI
  3. Azhar, M., Khalid, S., & Mehmood, R. (2014). Gender representation in Pakistani and British English fiction: A corpus based study. Research on Humanities and Social Sciences, 4(14), 1-7.
  4. Bahman, M., & Rahimi, A. (2010). Gender representation in EFL materials: an analysis of English textbooks of Iranian high schools. Procedia- Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9, 273-277. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.149 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Barreto, M., & Ellemers, N. (2005). The burden of benevolent sexism: How it contributes to the maintenance of gender inequalities. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35(5), 633-642. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.270 · DOI
  6. Bazzul, J., & Sykes, H. (2011). The secret identity of a biology textbook: Straight and naturally sexed. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 6(2), 265-286. doi: 10.1007/s11422-010-9297-z · DOI
  7. Blommaert, J., & Bulcaen, C. (2000). Critical discourse analysis. Annual Review of Anthropology, 29(1), 447-466. doi: 10.1146/annurev.anthro.29.1.447 · DOI
  8. Blumberg, R. L. (2008). The invisible obstacle to educational equality: Gender bias in textbooks. Prospects, 38(3), 345-361. doi: 10.1007/s11125-009-9086-1 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Britton, G. E., & Lumpkin, M. C. (1977). For sale: Subliminal bias in textbooks. The Reading Teacher, 31(1), 40-45.
  10. Brusokaitė, E. (2013). Gender representation in EFL textbooks (Doctoral Dissertation). Lithuanian University of Educational Sciences, Vilnius, Lithuania.
  11. Chick, K. A. (2006). Gender balance in K-12 American history textbooks. Social Studies Research and Practice, 1(3), 284-290. International and Multidisciplinary Journal of Social Sciences, 8(1) 19
  12. Clark Blickenstaff, J. (2005). Women and science careers: Leaky pipeline or gender filter? Gender and Education, 17(4), 369-386. doi: 10.1080/09540250500145072 · DOI
  13. Ebadi, S., Salman, A. R., & Marjal, B. E. (2015). Gender representation in the textbooks of teaching Persian to speakers of other languages. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 2(4), 143- 157.
  14. Ellemers, N. (2018). Gender stereotypes. Annual Review of Psychology. 69, 275-298. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011719 · DOI
  15. Fairclough, N. (2001). Language and power (2nd ed.). Harlow: Pearson Education.
  16. Foroutan, Y. (2012). Gender representation in school textbooks in Iran: The place of languages. Current Sociology, 60(6), 771-787. doi: 10.1177/0011392112459744 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Gharbavi, A., & Mousavi, S. A. (2012). The application of functional linguistics in exposing gender bias in Iranian high school English textbooks. English Language and Literature Studies, 2(1), 85-93.
  18. Gochman, D. S. (2013). Handbook of health behavior research II: Provider determinants. Springer Science & Business Media. doi: 10.1007/978- 1-4899-1760-7 · DOI
  19. Hamdan, S., & Jalabneh, A. (2009). Topics in EFL textbooks and the question of gender dominance: A case study from public schools of Jordan. The International Journal of Language Society and Culture, 28, 52-56.
  20. Jones, M. A., Kitetu, C., & Sunderland, J. (1997). Discourse roles, gender and language textbook dialogues: Who learns what from John and Sally? Gender and Education, 9(4), 469-490. doi: 10.1080/09540259721204 · DOI
  21. Kemp, J. E. (1977). Instructional design: A plan for unit and course development (2nd ed.). New York: Longman.
  22. Khurshid, K., Gillaniz, I. G., & Hashmi, M. A. (2010). A study of the representation of female image in the textbooks of English and Urdu at secondary school level. Pakistan Journal of Social Sciences (PJSS), 30(2), 425-437.
  23. Kim, J. (2014). The politics of inclusion/exclusion: Critical discourse analysis on multicultural education policy documents in South Korea. Multicultural Education Review, 6(2), 1-24. doi: 10.1080/2005615X.2014.11102910 · DOI
  24. Kobia, J. M. (2009). Femininity and masculinity in English primary school textbooks in Kenya. The International Journal of Language Society and Culture, 28, 57-71.
  25. Leo, R. J., & Cartagena, M. T. (1999). Gender bias in psychiatric texts. Academic Psychiatry, 23(2), 71-76. doi: 10.1007/BF03354245 · DOI
  26. Lesikin, J. (1998). Determining social prominence: A methodology for uncovering gender bias in ESL textbooks. College ESL, 8(1), 83-97. International and Multidisciplinary Journal of Social Sciences, 8(1) 21
  27. Lesikin, J. (2001). Determining social prominence: A methodology for uncovering gender bias in ESL textbooks. In D. R. Hall & A. Hewing (Eds), Innovation in English Language Teaching (pp.275-282). London: Rutledge.
  28. Levesque, R. J. (2011). Sex roles and gender roles. In Encyclopedia of Adolescence (pp. 2622-2623). Springer, New York, NY.
  29. Liddell, H. G., Scott, R., Jones, H. S., & Barber, E. A. (1968). Greek- English lexicon... with a supplement. Roderick McKenzie. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  30. Macleod, M., & Norrby, C. (2002). Sexual stereotyping in Swedish language textbooks. AUMLA-Journal of the Australasian Universities Language and Literature Association, 97(1), 51-73. doi: 10.1179/aulla.2002.97.1.005 · DOI
  31. Mahmood, K. (2011). Conformity to quality characteristics of textbooks: The illusion of textbook evaluation in Pakistan. Journal of Research and Reflections in Education, 5(2), 170-190.
  32. Nagatomo, D. (2010). A critical analysis of gender representation in an EFL textbook. Journal of the Ochanomizu University English Society, 1, 53-61.
  33. Ndura, E. (2004). ESL and cultural bias: An analysis of elementary through high school textbooks in the Western United States of America. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 17(2), 143-153. doi: 10.1080/07908310408666689 · DOI
  34. Nofal, M. Y., & Qawar, H. A. (2015). Gender representation in English language textbooks: Action pack 10. American Journal of Educational Science, 1(2), 14-18.
  35. Ram, L. (2008). Do the primary school textbooks in Pakistan reflect gender biases? A content analysis of illustrations. Journal of Research and Reflections in Education, 2(2), 92-102. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190807 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Reinharz, S. (1992). Feminist methods in social research. New York: Oxford University Press.
  37. Ritz, S. A., Antle, D. M., Côté, J., Deroy, K., Fraleigh, N., Messing, K., & Mergler, D. (2014). First steps for integrating sex and gender considerations into basic experimental biomedical research. The FASEB Journal, 28(1), 4-13. doi: 10.1096/fj.13-233395 · DOI
  38. Samadikhah, M., & Shahrokhi, M. (2014). A critical discourse analysis of ELT materials in gender representation: A comparison of summit and top notch. English Language Teaching, 8(1), 121. doi: 10.5539/elt. · DOI
  39. Shah, S. F. (2012). Gender inclusion: A neglected aspect of the English textbooks in Pakistan. International Journal of Social Sciences & Education, 3(1), 118-127.
  40. Siren, T. (2018). Representations of men and women in English language textbooks: A critical discourse analysis of open road 1-7 (Master Thesis). University of Oulu, Finland.
  41. Smith, A. D. (1991). National identity. Las Vegas: University of Nevada Press.
  42. Stockdale, D. A. (2006). Gender representation in an EFL textbook (Master Thesis). University of Birmingham, UK.
  43. Sumalatha, K., & Ramakrishnaiah, D. (2004). Sex bias in secondary school social studies textbooks: A case study in India. American Journal of Applied Sciences, 1(2), 62-63. doi: 10.3844/ajassp.2004.62.63 · DOI
  44. Turner-Bowker, D. M. (1996). Gender stereotyped descriptors in children's picture books: Does "Curious Jane" exist in the literature? Sex Roles, 35(7-8), 461-488. doi: 10.1007/BF01544132 · DOI
  45. Ullah, H., & Haque, H. (2016). The representation of boys' and girls' activities in school rextbooks. FWU Journal of Social Sciences, 10(1), 81-87.
  46. Van Dijk, T. A. (1999). Critical discourse analysis and conversation analysis. Discourse & Society, 10(4), 459-460. doi: 10.1177/0957926599010004001 · DOI
  47. World Bank, WTW (2011). World development report 2012: Gender equality and development. Washington D. C. Yaghoubi-Notash, M., & Nouri, Z. (2016). Inclusion/exclusion and role allocation in marketized EFL syllabus: Gender from CDA perspective. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 7(1), 110-118. doi: 10.17507/jltr.0701. · DOI
  48. Yasin, M. S. M., Hamid, B. A., Keong, Y. C., Othman, Z., & Jaludin, A. (2012). Linguistic sexism in Qatari primary mathematics textbooks. GEMA Online® Journal of Language Studies, 12(1), 53-68.

Authors
Ahmad, M., & Shah, S. K.
Affiliations
Government College University, Faisalabad (PK)
Venue
International and Multidisciplinary Journal of Social Sciences
Publisher
Hipatia Press
Published
2019-03-30
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
1
ISSN
2014-3680 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2945475247
Cited by
73
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 3
FWCI
12.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International and Multidisciplinary Journal of Social Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Hipatia Press (University of Barcelona) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Studies in Language
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Media, Gender, and Advertising
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Sexuality, and Education
Keywords
gender representation, gender bias, English textbooks, primary education, grade 5, Fairclough's three-dimensional model, male dominance, women writers, gender discrimination in education, textbook content analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review