Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 4

The DOI matches its DataCite record.

Learning inequality during the COVID-19 pandemic

Engzell, Per, Frey, Arun, Verhagen, Mark D.·2020·OSF Registries

Abstract

During the pandemic-induced lockdown in 2020, schools in many countries were forced to close for extended periods. It is of great policy interest to know whether students are able to have their educational needs met in these cir- cumstances, and identify groups at special risk. In this pre-analysis plan, we outline our data and research questions for a study on learning loss during the pandemic. The data comprise anonymized test scores from Dutch primary school students that we obtain through a partnership with the provider of a digital platform service to schools. We propose a difference-in-differences design to test whether educational performance declines during lockdown relative to previous years, and whether socioeconomically disadvantaged students are particularly affected. We also plan to test for differences by previous performance, gender and subject domain. We expect losses to be concentrated among disadvantaged students and boys, and to be greater in mathematics than spelling or reading.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.17605/osf.io/qtndg

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Engzell, P., Frey, A., & Verhagen, M. D.
Venue
OSF Registries
Publisher
OSF Registries
Published
2020
References
0

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.