House size and household structure: quantitative data in the study of Babylonian urban living conditions
Open accessAbstract
The aim of this paper is to examine the relationship between dwelling size, household structure and social status in urban Babylonia during the first millennium BC.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
This would make it a perfect candidate for a double courtyard house.
“This would make it a perfect candidate for a 'double courtyard house' (Baker 2014: 19-20;Baker 2015: 382-385).”
From Tracing Regime Change during the Transition from the Neo-Babylonian to the Achaemenid Empire at Nippur: Reconstruction of Archives Excavated in 1889 (2023) · cites this paper as Baker 2014: 19-20
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Schneider, B. (2023) · Asia Anteriore Antica. Journal of Ancient Near Eastern Cultures · doi:10.36253/asiana-1576 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
- Authors
- Baker, H. D.
- Corresponding author
- Baker, Heather D
- ORCID
- Baker, Heather D
- Venue
- Oxbow Books
- Publisher
- Oxbow Books
- Published
- 2014
- Pages
- 7-23
- OpenAlex
- W2767754148
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 4.28
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- Knowledge Commons (Lakehead University)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Ancient Near East History
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
- Keywords
- house size, household composition, social status, urban living conditions, 1st millennium BC, Mesopotamia
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
