Cited by 4Indian and Buddhist StudiesChinese history and philosophyPoetry Analysis and Criticism

The DOI matches its DataCite record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Invention of Chinese Buddhist Poetry: Poet-Monks in Late Medieval China (c. 760–960 CE)

Open access
Mazanec, Thomas·2017·Humanities Commons

Abstract

This dissertation presents an alternative history of late medieval literature, one which traces the development of Chinese Buddhist poetry into a fully autonomous tradition. It does so through a careful study of the works of poet-monks in the late medieval period (760–960). These poet-monks established a tradition of elite Buddhist poetry in classical Chinese that continued until the twentieth century. This dissertation also breaks new methodological ground by using digital tools to analyze medieval sources and by using poetry composition manuals to understand medieval Chinese poetry on its own terms. The introduction analyzes the meanings of “religious literature” and situates this study of poet-monks therein. Part I, comprised of chapters 2, 3, and 4, presents a social history of poet-monks first by examining the invention of the term “poet-monk” in the late eighth century and its development until the tenth, then by mapping literary relations in the late medieval period using social network analysis. It demonstrates the existence and importance of poet-monks to the literary culture of this time. Part II, comprised of chapters 5 and 6, turns to the monks’ poetics at their most extreme: first the wild excess of repetition in song, madness, and incantation; then the austere devotion of “bitter intoning” (kuyin) and the identification of poetry with meditation. Both extremes are the fruit of the poet-monks’ mixing of literary and religious practices. The conclusion shows how the poet-monks identified their religious and literary practices, hints at why their work had been neglected, and reflects on the implications of this dissertation for the study of religious poetry. Thus, this dissertation provides one way of answering the question of how to define religious poetry and sheds light on an overlooked corner of Chinese literary history, reconstructing an entire subtradition to demonstrate their fusion of religious and literary practices.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.17613/m63h4r

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Metadata

Authors
Mazanec, T.
Affiliations
Princeton University (US)
Corresponding author
Mazanec, Thomas
Venue
Humanities Commons
Publisher
Humanities Commons
Published
2017
OpenAlex
W2745908301
Cited by
4
References
4
Citations by year
2021: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1
FWCI
12.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Knowledge Commons (Lakehead University)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Indian and Buddhist Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Chinese history and philosophy
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Poetry Analysis and Criticism
Keywords
Chinese Buddhist poetry, religious poetry, classical Chinese poetry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review