CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 0

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Between Repurposing and Innovation: Governing the Resilience of Critical Offshore Energy Infrastructures in Italy

Prontera, Andrea, Passalacqua, Claudio Christopher·2026·Politics and Governance
DOI 10.17645/pag.12244
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Offshore energy infrastructures are becoming increasingly central to the low-carbon transition while raising pressing questions of resilience and security. Assets such as offshore wind installations, subsea electricity cables, and pipelines are exposed to a growing range of environmental, technological, and geopolitical risks, as well as cyber and physical threats. This article develops an analytical framework for the study of critical offshore energy infrastructure governance, combining two dimensions: modes of governance, ranging from public-led to private-led arrangements, and problem-framings, spanning threat-based and risk-based approaches. The framework is applied to the Italian case to trace recent institutional and policy developments in critical offshore energy infrastructure governance. Findings reveal an increasing securitisation of offshore energy infrastructures and a shift towards more public-led and threat-based approaches, alongside the consolidation of risk-based instruments focused on resilience and coordination with private operators. The article argues that these dynamics are shaped by path dependence: While the repurposing of existing institutional capacities enables rapid responses in an emerging policy field, it also contributes to fragmented governance arrangements and constrains the development of a more coherent framework. More broadly, the study highlights how competing governance modes and problem-framings shape critical infrastructure governance during the low-carbon transition.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.17645/pag.12244

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

Research works printed but not linked: 32

  1. Abrahamsen, R., & Williams, M. C. (2010). Security beyond the state: Private security in international politics. Cambridge University Press. · DOI
  2. Balzacq, T., Léonard, S., & Ruzicka, J. (2016). ‘Securitization’ revisited: Theory and cases. International Relations, 30(4), 494–531. · DOI
  3. Barquet, K., & Sjölander, F. (2025). Quiet power: How security interests shape offshore wind and marine spatial planning in Sweden. Energy Research & Social Science, 130, Article 104451. · DOI
  4. Beach, D., & Pedersen, R. B. (2019). Process-tracing methods: Foundations and guidelines. University of Michigan Press. · DOI
  5. Bueger, C., & Liebetrau, T. (2023). Critical maritime infrastructure protection: What’s the trouble? Marine Policy, 155, Article 105772. · DOI
  6. Buzan, B., Wæver, O., & De Wilde, J. (1998). Security: A new framework for analysis. Lynne Rienner Publishers. · DOI · Paper page
  7. Calcagno, E., & Marrone, A. (Eds.). (2023). The underwater environment and Europe’s defence and security. Istituto Affari Internazionali. https://www.iai.it/sites/default/files/iai2313.pdf
  8. Calcara, A. (2024). Governments and markets in the digital age. International Studies Review, 26(1), Article viae007. · DOI
  9. Calcara, A., & Marchetti, R. (2022). State–industry relations and cybersecurity governance in Europe. Review of International Political Economy, 29(4), 1237–1262. · DOI
  10. Cantelmi, R., Di Gravio, G., & Patriarca, R. (2021). Reviewing qualitative research approaches in the context of critical infrastructure resilience. Environment Systems and Decisions, 41(3), 341–376. · DOI · Paper page
  11. Capano, G. (2019). Reconceptualizing layering—From mode of institutional change to mode of institutional design: Types and outputs. Public Administration, 97(3), 590–604. · DOI
  12. Corry, O. (2012). Securitisation and ‘riskification’: Second-order security and the politics of climate change. Millennium, 40(2), 235–258. · DOI
  13. Cosentino, M. (2023). Italy’s underwater technological and industrial capabilities. In E. Calcagno & A. Marrone (Eds.), The underwater environment and Europe’s defence and security (pp. 61–67). Istituto Affari Internazionali. https://www.iai.it/sites/default/files/iai2313.pdf
  14. Coticchia, F., & Mazziotti di Celso, M. (2025). Still on the same path? Italian foreign and defence policy in the Enlarged Mediterranean. Mediterranean Politics, 30(3), 650–659. · DOI
  15. Della Porta, D., & Keating, M. (2008). Introduction. In D. Della Porta & M. Keating (Eds.), Approaches and methodologies in the social sciences: A pluralist perspective (pp. 1–17). Cambridge University Press. · DOI
  16. Levy, J. S. (2008). Case studies: Types, designs, and logics of inference. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 25(1), 1–18. · DOI
  17. Loader, I., & Walker, N. (2007). Civilizing security. Cambridge University Press. · DOI
  18. Mahoney, J. (2000). Path dependence in historical sociology. Theory and Society, 29(4), 507–548. · DOI · Paper page
  19. McCabe, R., & Flynn, B. (2024). Under the radar: Ireland, maritime security capacity, and the governance of subsea infrastructure. European Security, 33(2), 324–344. · DOI
  20. Moe, E., & Hansen, S. T. (2025). The ocean and the geopolitics of energy: A question of critical infrastructure? In T. Sattich, E. Moe, M. Grasso, M. Schreurs, & S. Yan (Eds.), De Gruyter handbook of ocean governance and maritime affairs (pp. 379–395). De Gruyter. · DOI
  21. Neal, A. W. (2026). After Nord Stream: four security dilemmas in critical maritime infrastructure protection. International Affairs, 102(1), 207–225. · DOI
  22. Omezzine, F., Oruganti, V., & Bodas Freitas, I. M. (2022). Learning from crisis: Repurposing to address grand challenges. Innovation and Development, 12(1), 59–69. · DOI
  23. Papamichael, I., Voukkali, I., Vrionides, K., Loizia, P., Stylianou, M., Sospiro, P., Liscio, M. C., Naddeo, V., & Zorpas, A. A. (2025). An overview of critical energy infrastructure of the European defence sector. Energy Nexus, 19, Article 100483. · DOI
  24. Petersen, K. L. (2012). Risk analysis—A field within security studies? European Journal of International Relations, 18(4), 693–717. · DOI
  25. Prontera, A. (2017). The new offshore frontiers of EU energy security in the Mediterranean: The politics of hydrocarbon development in the Adriatic and Ionian Seas. Mediterranean Politics, 22(3), 383–406. · DOI
  26. Pursiainen, C., & Kytömaa, E. (2023). From European critical infrastructure protection to the resilience of European critical entities: What does it mean? Sustainable and Resilient Infrastructure, 8, 85–101. · DOI
  27. Scovazzi, T. (2012). The Mediterranean Sea. In J. F. Di Mento & A. J. Hickman (Eds.), Environmental governance of the great seas: Law and effect (pp. 89–115). Edward Elgar Publishing.
  28. Sesini, M., Nicolle, A., Conti, I., & Piebalgs, A. (Eds.). (2026). European gas markets in transition. Edward Elgar Publishing. · DOI
  29. Steinmo, S. (2008). Historical institutionalism. In D. Della Porta & M. Keating (Eds.), Approaches and methodologies in the social sciences: A pluralist perspective (pp. 118–138). Cambridge University Press. · DOI · Paper page
  30. Van der Heijden, J. (2011). Institutional layering: A review of the use of the concept. Politics, 31(1), 9–18. · DOI
  31. Wæver, O. (1993). Securitization and desecuritization (Vol. 5). Centre for Peace and Conflict Research.
  32. Weiss, M., & Jankauskas, V. (2019). Securing cyberspace: How states design governance arrangements. Governance, 32(2), 259–275. · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Prontera, A., & Passalacqua, C. C.
Venue
Politics and Governance
Publisher
Cogitatio
Published
2026-06-24
Volume
14
ISSN
2183-2463
DOI
10.17645/pag.12244
Cited by
0
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (unspecified)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review