The DOI matches its Crossref record; 61 of the 63 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bicycle and Car Share Schemes as Inclusive Modes of Travel? A Socio-Spatial Analysis in Glasgow, UK
Open accessAbstract
Public bicycle and car sharing schemes have proliferated in recent years and are increasingly part of the urban transport landscape. Shared transport options have the potential to support social inclusion by improving accessibility: these initiatives could remove some of the barriers to car ownership or bicycle usage such as upfront costs, maintenance and storage. However, the existing evidence base indicates that, in reality, users are most likely to be white, male and middle class. This paper argues that there is a need to consider the social inclusivity of sharing schemes and to develop appropriate evaluation frameworks accordingly. We therefore open by considering ways in which shared transport schemes might be inclusive or not, using a framework developed from accessibility planning. In the second part of the paper, we use the case study of Glasgow in Scotland to undertake a spatial equity analysis of such schemes. We examine how well they serve different population groups across the city, using the locations of bicycle stations and car club parking spaces in Glasgow, comparing and contrasting bike and car. An apparent failure to deliver benefits across the demographic spectrum raises important questions about the socially inclusive nature of public investment in similar schemes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“In addition, the spatial extension of SAVs will be limited, given the market imperative that lies at the core of these on-demand systems [5].”
From The opportunity of shared autonomous vehicles to improve spatial equity in accessibility and socio-economic developments in European urban areas (2021) · cites this paper as [5]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“These are mostly highly educated, middle to high income individuals who use shared mobility as a substitute for other means of transport.”
From The opportunity of shared autonomous vehicles to improve spatial equity in accessibility and socio-economic developments in European urban areas (2021) · cites this paper as [5]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Saelens, B. E., Sallis, J. F., & Frank, L. D. (2003) · Annals of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1207/s15324796abm2502_03 · Cited by 2,285
Infrastructure, programs, and policies to increase bicycling: An international review
Pucher, J. R., Dill, J., & Handy, S. (2009) · Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2009.07.028 · Cited by 1,367
Commuting by Bicycle: An Overview of the Literature
Heinen, E., van Wee, B., & Maat, K. (2009) · Transport Reviews · doi:10.1080/01441640903187001 · Cited by 1,219
Accessibility, mobility and transport-related social exclusion
Preston, J. M., & Rajé, F. (2006) · Journal of Transport Geography · doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2006.05.002 · Cited by 837
Transport and social exclusion in London
Church, A., Frost, M., & Sullivan, K. (2000) · Transport Policy · doi:10.1016/s0967-070x(00)00024-x · Cited by 740
Bike Share: A Synthesis of the Literature
Fishman, E. K., Washington, S. P., & Haworth, N. L. (2013) · Transport Reviews · doi:10.1080/01441647.2013.775612 · Cited by 712
Cairncross, F. (1997) · Cited by 659
Bicycling renaissance in North America? An update and re-appraisal of cycling trends and policies
Pucher, J. R., Buehler, R., & Seinen, M. (2011) · Transportation Research Part A Policy and Practice · doi:10.1016/j.tra.2011.03.001 · Cited by 607
Lucas, K., van Wee, B., & Maat, K. (2015) · Transportation · doi:10.1007/s11116-015-9585-2 · Cited by 559
Firnkorn, J., & Müller, M. (2011) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.03.014 · Cited by 516
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Appleyard, D. (1981). Liveable streets. Berkeley, CA: Uni- versity of California Press.
- Black, W. (2003). Transportation: A geographical analy- sis. London: The Guildford Press.
Cited by
Commoning mobility: Towards a new politics of mobility transitions
Николаева, А., Adey, P., Cresswell, T., Lee, J. Y., Nóvoa, A., & Temenos, C. (2019) · Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers · doi:10.1111/tran.12287 · Cited by 251
Böcker, L., Anderson, E., Uteng, T. P., & Throndsen, T. S. (2020) · Transportation Research Part A Policy and Practice · doi:10.1016/j.tra.2020.06.009 · Cited by 175
Redefining Car Access: Ride-Hail Travel and Use in Los Angeles
Brown, A. (2019) · Journal of the American Planning Association · doi:10.1080/01944363.2019.1603761 · Cited by 156
Carsharing: a systematic literature review and research agenda
Nansubuga, B., & Kowalkowski, C. (2021) · Journal of service management · doi:10.1108/josm-10-2020-0344 · Cited by 136
Multimodal divide: Reproduction of transport poverty in smart mobility trends
Groth, S. (2019) · Transportation Research Part A Policy and Practice · doi:10.1016/j.tra.2019.04.018 · Cited by 149
Metadata
- Authors
- Clark, J., & Curl, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Glasgow (GB)
- Venue
- Social Inclusion
- Publisher
- Cogitatio
- Published
- 2016-06-07
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 83-99
- ISSN
- 2183-2803 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2290275811
- Cited by
- 74
- References
- 63
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 10.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Social Inclusion (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (submittedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Social Science Open Access Repository (GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- UC Research Repository (University of Canterbury) (submittedVersion)
- Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- University of Glasgow
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Transportation › Urban Transport and Accessibility
- Social Sciences › Transportation › Transportation and Mobility Innovations
- Social Sciences › Transportation › Transportation Planning and Optimization
- Keywords
- bike sharing, car sharing, shared mobility, accessibility (transport and spatial geography), spatial equity, socio-spatial analysis, demographic disparities, accessibility planning, evaluation framework, Glasgow
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
