Cited by 3Berry genetics and cultivation researchPlant tissue culture and regenerationEpigenetics and DNA Methylation

EPIGENETIC AND GENETIC VARIATION IN MICRO-PROPAGATED STRAWBERRY PLANTS

Zhihong Zhang·2014·Acta Horticulturae

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.17660/actahortic.2014.1049.2

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, Z.
Corresponding author
Zhihong Zhang
Venue
Acta Horticulturae
Published
2014-08
Issue
1049
Pages
63-66
ISSN
  • 0567-7572 (ISSN-L)
  • 2406-6168
OpenAlex
W2590912466
Cited by
3
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
2.19
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Acta Horticulturae (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Berry genetics and cultivation research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Plant tissue culture and regeneration
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
Keywords
strawberry, micropropagation, epigenetic variation, genetic variation, plant tissue culture, somaclonal variation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review