Cited by 37Educational Technology and E-LearningEducational Technology and AssessmentOnline and Blended Learning

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Exploring Moodle Functionality for Managing Open Distance Learning E-Assessments

Open access
KONERU, Indira·2017·Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education

Abstract

Current and emerging technologies enable Open Distance Learning (ODL) institutions integrate e-Learning in innovative ways and add value to the existing teaching-learning and assessment processes. ODL e-Assessment systems have evolved from Computer Assisted / Aided Assessment (CAA) systems through intelligent assessment and feedback systems. E-Assessment (electronic assessment) connotes using electronic technology and tools to design and administer assessments, collect and store students’ assessment evidences, grade performance, provide feedback and generate reports. The widely recognized advantages of e-Assessment over traditional, paper-based assessment include: lower long term costs, instant feedback to students, greater flexibility with respect to location and timing, improved reliability with machine marking, improved impartiality, and enhanced question styles that incorporate interactivity and multimedia. The advent of Learning Management Systems (LMS), such as Moodle (Modular Object-Oriented Dynamic Learning Environment) paved the way for integrated advanced services for: interactive dialogue, controlling knowledge at different stages of distance process and e-Assessment systems. Moodle provides the complete integrated environment for handling all aspects of e-Assessment from authoring questions through to reports for course teams (Butcher, 2008). This study explores how Moodle functionality: supports diagnostic, formative, summative and competency-based assessments and facilitates ODL institutions design, administer and manage e-Assessments.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.17718/tojde.340402

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
KONERU, I.
Affiliations
ICFAI Business School (IN)
Corresponding author
KONERU, Indira
Venue
Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education
Published
2017-10-01
Pages
129-141
ISSN
1302-6488 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2758157600
Cited by
37
References
2
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2018: 1
FWCI
3.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education (publishedVersion)
  • DergiPark (Istanbul University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Technology and E-Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Technology and Assessment
  • Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
Keywords
Moodle, online assessment, open and distance learning, virtual learning environments, computer-based testing, intelligent assessment, automated grading, feedback systems, diagnostic assessment, formative assessment, summative assessment, competency-based assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review