Cited by 294Inclusive Education and DiversityDisability Rights and RepresentationEducation Pedagogy and Practices

The DOI matches its Crossref record; its reference list is not available.

Cross-Pollinating Culturally Sustaining Pedagogy and Universal Design for Learning: Toward an Inclusive Pedagogy That Accounts for Dis/Ability

Waitoller, Federico R., King Thorius, Kathleen A.·2016·Harvard Educational Review

Abstract

In this article, Federico R. Waitoller and Kathleen A. King Thorius extend recent discussions on culturally sustaining pedagogy (CSP) in order to explicitly account for student dis/ability. The authors engage in this work as part of an inclusive education agenda. Toward this aim, they discuss how CSP and universal design for learning will benefit from cross-pollination and then conclude by suggesting interdisciplinary dialogue as a means to building emancipatory pedagogies that attend to intersecting markers of difference (e.g., dis/ability, class, gender, race, language, and ethnicity).

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.17763/1943-5045-86.3.366

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 51 · Cited by 294

Research works printed but not linked: 55

  1. 10.3102/0091732X10383208 · DOI
  2. 10.3102/0013189X11429391 · DOI
  3. Artiles A. J., 2007, Language Arts, 84, 357, 10.58680/la20075646 · DOI
  4. Artiles A. J., 2011, Inclusive education: Examining equity in five continents
  5. 10.1598/RRQ.35.1.12 · DOI
  6. Baglieri S., 2011, Teachers College Record, 113, 2122, 10.1177/016146811111301001 · DOI
  7. 10.1111/1467-9620.00175 · DOI
  8. 10.18061/dsq.v22i2.343 · DOI
  9. CAST., 2011, Universal design for learning guidelines version 2.0
  10. CAST., 2012, About CAST.
  11. Center for Universal Design., 1997, The principles of universal design (version 2.0)
  12. Charlton J. I., 2006, The disability studies reader, 217
  13. 10.18061/dsq.v31i3.1665 · DOI
  14. Chita-Tegmark M., 2011, Journal of Education, 192, 17, 10.1177/002205741219200104 · DOI
  15. 10.1177/0022487112446512 · DOI
  16. 10.18061/dsq.v32i3.1770 · DOI
  17. 10.1080/00933104.2013.838741 · DOI
  18. 10.1080/10665684.2013.750186 · DOI
  19. Davis L. J., 1995, Enforcing normalcy: Disability, deafness and the body
  20. Davis L. J., 2013, The disability studies reader (pp. 263-277)., 10.4324/9780203077887 · DOI
  21. 10.3726/978-1-4539-0039-0 · DOI
  22. 10.17763/haer.84.1.p00l8007p1v64853 · DOI
  23. 10.1177/073194871003300103 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Erevelles N., 2011, Teachers College Record, 113, 2155, 10.1177/016146811111301003 · DOI
  25. 10.1080/09540250802612688 · DOI
  26. Fraser N., 2008, Scales of justice: Reimagining political space in a globalizing world
  27. Garcia S. B., 2013, Multiple Voices for Ethnically Diverse Exceptional Learners, 13, 32, 10.56829/muvo.13.2.yv7822w58116kw42 · DOI
  28. Gay G., 2000, Culturally responsive teaching theory, research, and practice
  29. 10.1177/1077800414557827 · DOI
  30. Harry B., 2006, Why are so many minority students in special education? Understanding race and disability in schools
  31. 10.17763/haer.72.1.03866528702g2105 · DOI
  32. Holland D., 2001, History in person: Enduring struggles, contentious practice, intimate identities
  33. 10.1177/1363460711406463 · DOI
  34. 10.1177/0022466907313606 · DOI
  35. 10.17763/haer.84.1.p2rj131485484751 · DOI
  36. Lee C. D., 2007, Culture, literacy, and learning: Blooming in the midst of the whirlwind
  37. Leonardo Z., 2009, Race, whiteness, and education, 10.4324/9780203880371 · DOI
  38. Leonardo Z., 2011, Teachers College Record, 113, 2206, 10.1177/016146811111301008 · DOI
  39. 10.3102/0013189X035006012 · DOI
  40. 10.1525/aeq.1995.26.3.05x0936z · DOI · Paper page
  41. 10.1177/0895904899013005001 · DOI
  42. Moll L. C., 1994, Journal of Reading Behavior, 26, 23
  43. Nasir N., 2006, Handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 489-504).
  44. National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, Council of Chief State School Officers., 2010, CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.W., 11, 12
  45. 10.3102/0013189X12441244 · DOI · Paper page
  46. Rose D. H., 2002, Teaching every student in the digital age: Universal design for learning
  47. 10.1017/CBO9780511843693 · DOI
  48. Schweik S. M., 2009, The ugly laws: Disability in public, 10.18574/nyu/9780814740880.001.0001 · DOI
  49. Smith F. G., 2012, Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 12, 31
  50. Snow, C. (2006). What counts as literacy in early childhood? In K. McCartney & D. Phillips (Eds.),Handbook ofearly child development (pp.274-294). Oxford: Blackwell. · DOI
  51. 10.1207/s15430421tip4304_5 · DOI
  52. Strauss J. N., 2013, The disability studies reader (pp. 460-484).
  53. Sullivan A. L., 2010, Race, Gender & Class, 17, 93
  54. 10.1007/978-1-137-02019-2 · DOI
  55. Thorius K. A. K., 2015, D. Connor, B. Ferri, & S

Metadata

Authors
Waitoller, F. R., & King Thorius, K. A.
Affiliations
University of Illinois Chicago (US)
Venue
Harvard Educational Review
Published
2016
Volume
86
Issue
3
Pages
366-389
ISSN
  • 0017-8055 (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-5045
OpenAlex
W2520758566
Cited by
294
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 37 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 1
FWCI
66.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Harvard Educational Review (publishedVersion)
Funders
Office of Elementary and Secondary Education
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Inclusive Education and Diversity
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Disability Rights and Representation
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education Pedagogy and Practices
Keywords
culturally sustaining pedagogy, Universal Design for Learning, inclusive education, intersectionality, emancipatory education, disability in education, interdisciplinary dialogue

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cross-Pollinating Culturally Sustaining Pedagogy and Universal Design for Learning: Toward an Inclusive Pedagogy That Accounts for Dis/Ability. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.17763/1943-5045-86.3.366
The paper
Waitoller, F. R., & King Thorius, K. A. (2016). Cross-Pollinating Culturally Sustaining Pedagogy and Universal Design for Learning: Toward an Inclusive Pedagogy That Accounts for Dis/Ability. Harvard Educational Review. https://doi.org/10.17763/1943-5045-86.3.366