Cited by 28Education Discipline and InequalityBehavioral and Psychological StudiesLegal Issues in Education

The Emerging Promise of Restorative Practices To Reduce Discipline Disparities Affecting Youth with Disabilities and Youth of Color: Addressing Access and Equity

KERVICK, COLBY T., MOORE, MIKA, BALLYSINGH, TRACY ARÁMBULA, GARNETT, BERNICE RAVECHE, SMITH, LANCE C.·2019·Harvard Educational Review

Abstract

In this article, Kervick and colleagues posit that restorative practices (RP) implementation promises to mitigate educational inequities resulting from discipline disparities for youth with disabilities and youth of color. Recent efforts to reduce these disparities have emphasized more relational approaches to behavioral change. Kervick et al. argue that nonpunitive restorative approaches promise to mitigate discipline disparities for racialized youth and youth with disabilities within a schoolwide multitiered systems of support framework only if implemented with an emphasis on educational access and equity. They offer practical tools and strategies to support teachers with implementation of inclusive, accessible, and equitable Tier 1 restorative circles.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.17763/1943-5045-89.4.588

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Kervick et al. (2019) argue that a critical step in achieving widespread and productive exposure to restorative practices is to ensure that teachers receive training in equity literacy, critical consciousness, bias awareness, and culturally responsive teaching.

    “Indeed, Kervick et al. (2019) argue that a critical step in achieving widespread and productive exposure to restorative practices is to ensure that teachers receive training in equity literacy, critical consciousness, bias awareness, and culturally responsive teaching.”

    From Fostering Belonging, Transforming Schools: The Impact of Restorative Practices (2023) · cites this paper as Kervick et al. (2019)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
KERVICK, C. T., MOORE, M., BALLYSINGH, T. A., GARNETT, B. R., & SMITH, L. C.
Affiliations
University of Vermont (US)
Venue
Harvard Educational Review
Published
2019
Volume
89
Issue
4
Pages
588-610
ISSN
  • 0017-8055 (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-5045
OpenAlex
W2995498014
Cited by
28
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 1
FWCI
8.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Harvard Educational Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education Discipline and Inequality
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
  • Social Sciences › Law › Legal Issues in Education
Keywords
restorative practices, school discipline disparities, youth with disabilities, youth of color, educational equity, multi-tiered systems of support, restorative circles, inclusive education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review