Cited by 10Literacy, Media, and EducationLinguistics and Education ResearchEducational Philosophies and Pedagogies

Moving Beyond Interpretive Monism: A Disciplinary Heuristic to Bridge Literary Theory and Literacy Theory

REYNOLDS, TODD, RUSH, LESLIE S., LAMPI, JODI P., HOLSCHUH, JODI PATRICK·2021·Harvard Educational Review

Abstract

In this essay, authors Todd Reynolds, Leslie S. Rush, Jodi P. Lampi, and Jodi Patrick Holschuh provide a disciplinary heuristic that bridges literary and literacy theories. The secondary English language arts (ELA) classroom is situated at the intersection between literary theory and literacy theory, where too often literary theory does not include pedagogical practices and literacy theory does not take disciplinary differences into account. Reynolds and coauthors propose an English Language Arts heuristic for disciplinary literacy to guide teachers toward embracing student-led interpretations. They explore the connections among the Common Core State Standards, New Criticism, and the ELA classroom and focus on the prevalence of interpretive monism, which is the belief that only one interpretation is appropriate for students when reading a literary text. The essay explicates a heuristic for ELA literacy that centers on students actively creating interpretations of and transforming literary texts. By embracing this heuristic, the authors assert, teachers can focus on student-led interpretations of literary texts and thus empower their students.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.17763/1943-5045-91.3.382

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
REYNOLDS, T., RUSH, L. S., LAMPI, J. P., & HOLSCHUH, J. P.
Affiliations
  • University of Wyoming (US)
  • Northern Illinois University (US)
  • Texas State University (US)
Venue
Harvard Educational Review
Published
2021
Volume
91
Issue
3
Pages
382-401
ISSN
  • 0017-8055 (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-5045
OpenAlex
W3201387366
Cited by
10
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3
FWCI
19.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Harvard Educational Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Literacy, Media, and Education
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Linguistics and Education Research
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Philosophies and Pedagogies
Keywords
literary theory, literacy theory, English language arts, disciplinary literacy, high school English teaching, Common Core State Standards, New Criticism, literary interpretation, student empowerment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review