Unique Challenges for Women of Color in STEM Transferring from Community Colleges to Universities
Abstract
In this article, Marie-Elena Reyes presents the issues faced by women of color in the fields of science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) as they transfer from community colleges to universities. Community colleges offer a great potential for diversifying and increasing participation of underrepresented groups in STEM. Many women of color enter higher education through community colleges, but transfer rates are low, and retention rates of transfer students into STEM at universities are lower still. Through interviews conducted with participants in the National Science Foundation–funded Futurebound program, Reyes reveals an atmosphere in which women of color transfer students experience attitudes and treatment signaling that they do not belong because of age, ethnicity, and gender as well as preconceptions that transfer students are not adequately prepared. Reyes proposes that programs and policies to integrate responses to these challenges could improve the transfer rates and retention of women of color into STEM fields.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Students transferring from 2-year colleges into STEM classes and majors at 4-year institutions may face unfavorable stereotypes by both faculty and peers about the ability and success of transfer students in STEM courses.
“students transferring from 2-year colleges into STEM classes and majors at 4-year institutions may also face unfavorable stereotypes by both faculty and peers about the ability and success of transfer students in STEM courses (Reyes, 2011).”
From A Meta-analysis of University STEM Summer Bridge Program Effectiveness (2021) · cites this paper as Reyes, 2011
Cites
Whose culture has capital? A critical race theory discussion of community cultural wealth
Yosso *, T. J. (2005) · Race Ethnicity and Education · doi:10.1080/1361332052000341006 · Cited by 7,546 · see citing works
Carlone, H. B., & Johnson, A. (2007) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.20237 · Cited by 2,433 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Meta-analysis of University STEM Summer Bridge Program Effectiveness
Bradford, B. C., Beier, M. E., & Oswald, F. L. (2021) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.20-03-0046 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Williams, K. L., & Taylor, L. D. (2022) · Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering · doi:10.1615/jwomenminorscieneng.2022036596 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
- Authors
- Reyes, M.-E.
- Corresponding author
- Reyes, Marie-Elena
- Venue
- Harvard Educational Review
- Publisher
- Harvard Education Publishing Group
- Published
- 2011-06-01
- Volume
- 81
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 241-263
- ISSN
- 0017-8055 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-5045
- OpenAlex
- W2156978459
- Cited by
- 191
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 16.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Harvard Educational Review (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Career Development and Diversity
- Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Critical Race Theory in Education
- Keywords
- women of color, stem, community college transfer, transfer students, student retention, underrepresented groups in STEM, sense of belonging, higher education policy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review