The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Universal Design for Learning and the Arts
Abstract
In this article, Don Glass, Anne Meyer, and David H. Rose examine the intersection of arts education and Universal Design for Learning (UDL) to inform the design of better art, curricula, and UDL checkpoints. They build a case for the contribution of the arts to expert learning across the affective, recognition, and strategic neural networks and argue for making affective and reflective learning outcomes more explicit in the arts. Throughout this piece, the authors call for a vision of the arts playing an increasing role in providing engaging learning options in an integrated general curriculum.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“no studies have empirically examined these connections yet.”
From Fostering inclusive learning through bilingual drama-based storytime and UDL for young emergent multilinguals with disabilities (2025) · cites this paper as Glass et al. (2013)
Citations
Cites
Mindset: The New Psychology of Success
(2006) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.44-2397 · Cited by 7,804
Grit: perseverance and passion for long-term goals
Duckworth, A. L., Peterson, C., Matthews, M. D., & Kelly, D. R. (2007) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.92.6.1087 · Cited by 6,911
The expert learner: Strategic, self-regulated, and reflective
Ertmer, P. A., & Newby, T. J. (1996) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/bf00156001 · Cited by 716
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Meyer, A., Rose, D. H., & Gordon, D. T. (In press). Universal Design for Learning: Theory and practice. Wakefield, MA: National Center on Universal Design for Learning.
- National Research Council. (2012). Education for life and work: Developing transferable knowledge and skills in the 21st century. (J. W. Pellegrino and M. L. Hilton, Eds.). Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kilinc, S., Borowski, N. D., Millinger, J., & Kelley, M. F. (2025) · Journal of Childhood, Education & Society · doi:10.37291/2717638x.202562611 · Cited by 3
“UDL can enhance DBP by promoting inclusivity and accessibility through thoughtful planning, while DBP inherently incorporates key UDL principles, such as physical expression (Glass et al., 2013).”
Influential
Metadata
- Authors
- Glass, D., Meyer, A., & Rose, D.
- Venue
- Harvard Educational Review
- Publisher
- Harvard Education Publishing Group
- Published
- 2013-04-01
- Volume
- 83
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 98-119
- ISSN
- 0017-8055 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-5045
- OpenAlex
- W2130360563
- Cited by
- 94
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 79.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Harvard Educational Review (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Visual Arts and Performing Arts › Art Education and Development
- Social Sciences › Education › Disability Education and Employment
- Social Sciences › Education › Inclusive Education and Diversity
- Keywords
- Universal Design for Learning, art education, curriculum development, affective learning, reflective learning, artificial neural networks, expert learning, inclusive curriculum, general education
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review