The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Between Old and New: Social Movements and Cultural Change
Open accessAbstract
Social movement actors often challenge authorities on behalf of people whose needs and interests are not addressed. To do this, they must accomplish a contradictory task. They must frame their challenges in interpretive packages that are contrary to the dominant culture while at the same time struggle to make these contrary views part of the dominant culture. How do movement actors succeed in this seemingly impossible task? Our review of cultural studies of social movements points to two strategies: (1) linking controversial topics like abortion with generally accepted and valued notions like basic rights; (2) associating their interpretive package, such as protecting the ecology, with an existing theme, such as harmony with nature, that as an alternative cultural context may legitimate their package. We use a case study, the abolitionist movement in Great Britain, to test these propositions. The case material confirms their utility, but also illustrates a third strategy: relating the package to cultural themes that are becoming dominant. The role the changing cultural context in producing new meanings is indicated. The findings lead to a discussion about the role of movement actors, the cultural context, and the changes therein in the production of meaning.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In many ways, this has proven to be an effective frame and tactic for the contemporary antislavery movement, at least in part by drawing upon the universal consensus decrying the transatlantic system that developed from nineteenth century abolitionism (see D ' Anjou and Van Male 1998; Snow and Benford 1992).”
From Collapsing the Boundaries Between De Jure and De Facto Slavery: The Foundations of Slavery Beyond the Transatlantic Frame (2020) · cites this paper as D ' Anjou and Van Male 1998
Citations
Cited by
Schwarz, K., & Nicholson, A. (2020) · Human Rights Review · doi:10.1007/s12142-020-00604-y · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- d'Anjou, L., & Van Male, J.
- Affiliations
- Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
- Erasmus Universiteit, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Venue
- Mobilization: An International Quarterly
- Publisher
- Mobilization Journal
- Published
- 1998-10-01
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 207-226
- ISSN
- 1086-671X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W94447094
- Cited by
- 49
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 4.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- repub.eur.nl
- Licence
- other-oa
- Locations
- Mobilization An International Quarterly (publishedVersion)
- RePub (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Movements and Cultural Identity
- Social Sciences › Communication › Rhetoric and Communication Studies
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Communism, Protests, Social Movements
- Keywords
- social movements, cultural change, framing, dominant culture, abortion rights, environmental movement, abolitionism, cultural context, meaning production
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.