Comparative characteristics of the methods for determining the somatic sex of an adult person with the use of a skull
Open accessAbstract
The analysis of Russian and foreign literature on the definition of somatic sex on the skull is presented. Cranioscopic and craniometric approaches are considered in carrying out craniological studies and existing traditional and modern methods for their implementation. Cranioscopic studies reveal the advantages and disadvantages of W.M. Krogman, G. Acsadi, J. Nemeskeri and V.N. Zvyagina methods. It is shown that the method of V.N. Zvyagina, which includes 40 descriptive diagnostic signs, is the most informative. Its efficiency is 93,5%. The comparative analysis of the craniometric methods for studying the skull according to R. Martin and H. Welcker in the modification of A.P. Bogdanov and a number of English craniologists is presented. The authors point out that the Russian Forensic Center developed a craniological form, which includes 79 different sizes of a skull, by which is possible to determine not only the sex of a skull, but also the approximate age of a person. A comparative assessment of the Russian (V.I. Pashkova) and foreign (E. Giles) craniometric studies is presented. According to V.I. Pashkova using only craniometric techniques allows one to determine the sex of the skull only in 75-80%, and in the complex approach - in 80-93%. The method of E. Giles, based on the study of regression equations, is objective in 83-86%. Thus, studies of the sex determination by skull in an adult should be comprehensive, including both cranioscopic and craniometric techniques.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Cranioscopic features allow reliable (95% probability) sex determination of an unknown skull in 93% of cases, whereas craniometric methods reach only 75-80%.
“особенности рельефа позволяют при помощи единственной краниоскопической оценки достоверно (с вероятностью 95%) установить пол неизвестного черепа в 93% случаев, в то время как эффективность краниометрических методик едва ли достигает 75-80% [8-10].”
From Cranioscopic and craniometric characteristics of the adult neurocranium in normal and deformed states (2025) · cites this paper as [9]
The Abstract reports 93.5% effectiveness for Zvyagin’s cranioscopic method, and 75–80% sex determination using craniometric methods alone according to Pashkova. It does not specify a 95% probability for the cranioscopic result, and the 93.5% figure applies to a method assessing 40 diagnostic features, not cranioscopic features generally. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Introduction to Forensic Anthropology
Byers, S. N. (2016) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315642031 · Cited by 240 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Buikstra, J.E. Standards for Data Collection from Human Skeletal Remains: Proceedings of a Seminar at the Field Museum of Natural History (Arkansas Archeological Report Research Series) / J.E. Buikstra, D.H. Ubelaker // Arkansas Archeological Survey Research series. -1994. -№ 40. -218 p.
- Burns, K.R. Forensic Anthropology Training Manual / K.R. Burns. -New York, London: Routledge, 2012. -384 p.
- Iscan, M.Y. Forensic Analysis of the Skull: Craniofacial Analysis, Reconstruction, and Identification / M. Y. Iscan, R. P. Helmer. - New York: Wiley-Liss, 1993. -258 p.
- Steele, D.G. The Anatomy and Biology of the Human Skeleton / D.G. Steele, C.A. Bramblett. -Texas: A&M University Press, 1988. -304 p.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Gaivoronsky, I. V., Solovyev, K. V., & Kirillova, M. P. (2025) · Morphology · doi:10.17816/morph.677566 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Self-citationMussabekova, S., & Stoyan, A. O. (2022) · Journal of Clinical Medicine of Kazakhstan · doi:10.23950/jcmk/11682 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Гайворонский, И. В., Solovyev, K. V., Nesterov, D. V., & Kirillova, M. P. (2026) · Journal of Anatomy and Histopathology · doi:10.18499/2225-7357-2026-15-2-9-18
Cranioscopic methods for determining human sex using the skull
Popov, V. L., Гайворонский, И. В., Маликовна, Ф. О., Solovyev, K. V., Ничипорук, Г. И., & Shirobokov, I. G. (2026) · Forensic Medical Expertise · doi:10.17116/sudmed20266904134
- Authors
- Gaivoronsky, I. V., Fandeyeva, O. M., Nichiporuk, G. I., & Gaivoronskaya, M. G.
- Venue
- Bulletin of the Russian Military Medical Academy
- Publisher
- ECO-Vector LLC (Publications)
- Published
- 2018-12-15
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 207-213
- ISSN
- 1682-7392 (ISSN-L)
- 2687-1424
- OpenAlex
- W3093985175
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Bulletin of the Russian Military Medical Academy (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Anatomy › Medical and Biological Sciences
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Dermatoglyphics and Human Traits
- Keywords
- sex determination, adult skull, cranioscopy, craniometry, forensic anthropology, age estimation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review