The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Double-Difference Earthquake Location Algorithm: Method and Application to the Northern Hayward Fault, California
Abstract
We have developed an efficient method to determine high-resolution hypocenter locations over large distances. The location method incorporates ordinary absolute travel-time measurements and/or cross-correlation P-and S-wave differential travel-time measurements. Residuals between observed and theoretical travel-time differences (or double-differences) are minimized for pairs of earthquakes at each station while linking together all observed event-station pairs. A least-squares solu- tion is found by iteratively adjusting the vector difference between hypocentral pairs. The double-difference algorithm minimizes errors due to unmodeled velocity struc- ture without the use of station corrections. Because catalog and cross-correlation data are combined into one system of equations, interevent distances within multiplets are determined to the accuracy of the cross-correlation data, while the relative lo- cations between multiplets and uncorrelated events are simultaneously determined to the accuracy of the absolute travel-time data. Statistical resampling methods are used to estimate data accuracy and location errors. Uncertainties in double-difference locations are improved by more than an order of magnitude compared to catalog locations. The algorithm is tested, and its performance is demonstrated on two clus- ters of earthquakes located on the northern Hayward fault, California. There it col- lapses the diffuse catalog locations into sharp images of seismicity and reveals hor- izontal lineations of hypocenters that define the narrow regions on the fault where stress is released by brittle failure.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Jackknife, the Bootstrap and Other Resampling Plans
Efron, B. (1982) · Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics eBooks · doi:10.1137/1.9781611970319 · Cited by 8,120
Solving Least Squares Problems
Lawson, C. L., & Hanson, R. J. (1995) · doi:10.1137/1.9781611971217 · Cited by 7,103
Cited by
Aftershocks driven by a high-pressure CO2 source at depth
Miller, S. A., Collettini, C., Chiaraluce, L., Cocco, M., Barchi, M., & Kaus, B. J. P. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02251 · Cited by 869
The detection of low magnitude seismic events using array-based waveform correlation
Gibbons, S. J., & Ringdal, F. (2006) · Geophysical Journal International · doi:10.1111/j.1365-246x.2006.02865.x · Cited by 772
The Source-Scanning Algorithm: mapping the distribution of seismic sources in time and space
Kao, H., & Shan, S.-J. (2004) · Geophysical Journal International · doi:10.1111/j.1365-246x.2004.02276.x · Cited by 447
Inner Core Differential Motion Confirmed by Earthquake Waveform Doublets
Zhang, J., Song, X., Li, Y., Richards, P. G., Sun, X., & Waldhauser, F. (2005) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1113193 · Cited by 149
Self-citationSeismic Arrival-time Picking on Distributed Acoustic Sensing Data using Semi-supervised Learning
Zhu, W., Biondi, E., Li, J., Yin, J., Ross, Z. E., & Zhan, Z. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-43355-3 · Cited by 130
Metadata
- Authors
- Waldhauser, F.
- Venue
- Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
- Published
- 2000-12-01
- Volume
- 90
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1353-1368
- ISSN
- 0037-1106 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2099857446
- Cited by
- 3,562
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 19.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Double-Difference Earthquake Location Algorithm: Method and Application to the Northern Hayward Fault, California. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1785/0120000006
- The paper
- Waldhauser, F. (2000). A Double-Difference Earthquake Location Algorithm: Method and Application to the Northern Hayward Fault, California. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120000006
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.