The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The 17 May 2013 M 4.6 Ladysmith, Quebec, Earthquake
Abstract
Research Article| January 28, 2015 The 17 May 2013 M 4.6 Ladysmith, Quebec, Earthquake Allison L. Bent; Allison L. Bent aCanadian Hazards Information Service, Geological Survey of Canada, Natural Resources Canada, 7 Observatory Crescent, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1A 0Y3abent@nrcan.gc.ca Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Maurice Lamontagne; Maurice Lamontagne bPublic Safety Geoscience Program, Geological Survey of Canada, Natural Resources Canada, 615 Booth Street, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1A 0E9 Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Veronika Peci; Veronika Peci aCanadian Hazards Information Service, Geological Survey of Canada, Natural Resources Canada, 7 Observatory Crescent, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1A 0Y3abent@nrcan.gc.ca Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Stephen Halchuk; Stephen Halchuk aCanadian Hazards Information Service, Geological Survey of Canada, Natural Resources Canada, 7 Observatory Crescent, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1A 0Y3abent@nrcan.gc.ca Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Gregory R. Brooks; Gregory R. Brooks bPublic Safety Geoscience Program, Geological Survey of Canada, Natural Resources Canada, 615 Booth Street, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1A 0E9 Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Dariush Motazedian; Dariush Motazedian cDepartment of Earth Sciences, Carleton University, 1125 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1S 5B6 Search for…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the western Quebec seismic zone, previous neotectonic studies have mostly focused on seismology and sedimentology and less on earthquake geology and tectonic geomorphology.
“In the WQSZ, previous neotectonic studies have mostly focused on seismology and sedimentology and less so on the earthquake geology and tectonic geomorphology (Baird et al. 2010;Bent et al. 2015;Brooks and Adams 2020;Doughty et al. 2010;Ma and Motazedian 2012;Mohajer et al. 1992;Alinia et al. 2017).”
From Tectonic geomorphology of the Ottawa-Bonnechere Graben, Eastern Canada: implications for regional uplift and intraplate seismicity (2023) · cites this paper as Bent et al. 2015
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Gusti, U. K., Peace, A. L., & Rimando, J. (2023) · Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences · doi:10.1139/cjes-2022-0137 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Bent, A. L., Lamontagne, M., Peci, V., Halchuk, S., Brooks, G. R., Motazedian, D., Hunter, J. A., Adams, J., Woodgold, C., Drysdale, J., Hayek, S., & Edwards, W. N.
- Venue
- Seismological Research Letters
- Published
- 2015-01-28
- Volume
- 86
- Issue
- 2A
- Pages
- 460-476
- ISSN
- 0895-0695
- 1938-2057
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
