Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 349

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

LLNL‐G3Dv3: Global P wave tomography model for improved regional and teleseismic travel time prediction

Simmons, N. A., Myers, S. C., Johannesson, G., Matzel, E.·2012·Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth

Abstract

We develop a global‐scale P wave velocity model (LLNL‐G3Dv3) designed to accurately predict seismic travel times at regional and teleseismic distances simultaneously. The model provides a new image of Earth's interior, but the underlying practical purpose of the model is to provide enhanced seismic event location capabilities. The LLNL‐G3Dv3 model is based on ∼2.8 million P and Pn arrivals that are re‐processed using our global multiple‐event locator called Bayesloc. We construct LLNL‐G3Dv3 within a spherical tessellation based framework, allowing for explicit representation of undulating and discontinuous layers including the crust and transition zone layers. Using a multiscale inversion technique, regional trends as well as fine details are captured where the data allow. LLNL‐G3Dv3 exhibits large‐scale structures including cratons and superplumes as well numerous complex details in the upper mantle including within the transition zone. Particularly, the model reveals new details of a vast network of subducted slabs trapped within the transition beneath much of Eurasia, including beneath the Tibetan Plateau. We demonstrate the impact of Bayesloc multiple‐event location on the resulting tomographic images through comparison with images produced without the benefit of multiple‐event constraints (single‐event locations). We find that the multiple‐event locations allow for better reconciliation of the large set of direct P phases recorded at 0–97° distance and yield a smoother and more continuous image relative to the single‐event locations. Travel times predicted from a 3‐D model are also found to be strongly influenced by the initial locations of the input data, even when an iterative inversion/relocation technique is employed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/2012jb009525

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 43 references

Cited by

See all 349

Metadata

Authors
Simmons, N. A., Myers, S. C., Johannesson, G., & Matzel, E.
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth
Published
2012-10
Volume
117
Issue
B10
ISSN
0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1710491879
Cited by
349
References
43
FWCI
22.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: LLNL‐G3Dv3: Global P wave tomography model for improved regional and teleseismic travel time prediction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2012jb009525
The paper
Simmons, N. A., Myers, S. C., Johannesson, G., & Matzel, E. (2012). LLNL‐G3Dv3: Global P wave tomography model for improved regional and teleseismic travel time prediction. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth. https://doi.org/10.1029/2012jb009525

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.