Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 895

The DOI matches its OpenAlex record; 96 of the 96 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Common pitfalls and recommendations for using machine learning to detect and prognosticate for COVID-19 using chest radiographs and CT scans

Open access
Michael T. Roberts, Derek Driggs, Matthew Thorpe, Julian Gilbey, Yeung, Michael, Stephan Ursprung, Angelica I. Avilés-Rivero, Christian Etmann, Cathal McCague, Lucian Beer, Jonathan Richard Weir-McCall, Zhongzhao Teng, Effrossyni Gkrania‐Klotsas, James H F Rudd, Evis Sala, Carola‐Bibiane Schönlieb, Alessandro Ruggiero, Anna Korhonen, Emily Jefferson, Emmanuel Ako, Georg Langs, G. Gozaliasl, Guang Zhong Yang, Helmut Prosch, Jacobus Preller, Jan Stanczuk, Jing Ping Tang, Johannes Hofmanninger, Judith L Babar, Lorena Escudero Sánchez, Muhunthan Thillai, Gonzalez, Paula Martin, Philip Teare, Xiao Xiang Zhu, Mishal N. Patel, Cafolla, Conor, Hojjat Azadbakht, Joseph Jacob, Josh Lowe, Kang Zhang, Bradley, Kyle, Marcel Wassin, Holzer, Markus, Kangyu Ji, Maria Delgado-Ortet, Tao Ai, Nicholas A. Walton, Píetro Lió, Samuel D. Stranks, Tolou Shadbahr, Weizhe Lin, Yunfei Zha, Zhangming Niu·2020·Apollo (University of Cambridge)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

OpenAlex · 10.17863/cam.64000

Cites

96 of 96 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 96 references

Cited by

See all 895

Metadata

Authors
Roberts, M. T., Driggs, D., Thorpe, M., Gilbey, J., Yeung, M., Ursprung, S., Avilés-Rivero, A. I., Etmann, C., McCague, C., Beer, L., Weir-McCall, J. R., Teng, Z., Gkrania‐Klotsas, E., Rudd, J. H. F., Sala, E., Schönlieb, C., Ruggiero, A., Korhonen, A., Jefferson, E., Ako, E., Langs, G., Gozaliasl, G., Yang, G. Z., Prosch, H., Preller, J., Stanczuk, J., Tang, J. P., Hofmanninger, J., Babar, J. L., Sánchez, L. E., Thillai, M., Gonzalez, P. M., Teare, P., Zhu, X. X., Patel, M. N., Cafolla, C., Azadbakht, H., Jacob, J., Lowe, J., Zhang, K., Bradley, K., Wassin, M., Holzer, M., Ji, K., Delgado-Ortet, M., Ai, T., Walton, N. A., Lió, P., Stranks, S. D., Shadbahr, T., Lin, W., Zha, Y., & Niu, Z.
Venue
Apollo (University of Cambridge)
Publisher
University of Cambridge
Published
2020-08-20
OpenAlex
W3136933888
Cited by
895
References
96
FWCI
76.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Common pitfalls and recommendations for using machine learning to detect and prognosticate for COVID-19 using chest radiographs and CT scans. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.17863/cam.64000
The paper
Roberts, M. T., Driggs, D., Thorpe, M., Gilbey, J., Yeung, M., Ursprung, S., Avilés-Rivero, A. I., Etmann, C., McCague, C., Beer, L., Weir-McCall, J. R., Teng, Z., Gkrania‐Klotsas, E., Rudd, J. H. F., Sala, E., Schönlieb, C., Ruggiero, A., Korhonen, A., Jefferson, E., . . . Niu, Z. (2020). Common pitfalls and recommendations for using machine learning to detect and prognosticate for COVID-19 using chest radiographs and CT scans. Apollo (University of Cambridge). https://doi.org/10.17863/cam.64000

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.