Cited by 19Sharing Economy and PlatformsDigital Platforms and EconomicsDigital Economy and Work Transformation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 5 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

Trust in peer platform markets: Consumer survey findings

Open access
OECD·2017·OECD Digital Economy Papers

Abstract

Trust is a key component in peer platform markets (PPMs). In 2016, the OECD’s Committee on Consumer Policy (CCP) produced a report on Protecting consumers in peer platform markets: Exploring the issues. The 2016 report examined a number of the mechanisms that peer platforms have themselves developed to help engender trust in and use of their services (e.g. initiatives such as ratings and reviews) and raised a set of questions for further research and reflection. In order to understand better the role and drivers of consumer trust in PPMs, the CCP conducted an online survey of 10 000 consumers across ten OECD member countries. This report discusses the findings of that survey.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1787/1a893b58-en

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

227 Own result · 34 Own interpretation · 34 No basis given · 13 Own method · 5 Sources not found

Show all 158 claims

  • It may state two separate claims as one. 136
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 6
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 25
155 of 155
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Peer platform markets have grown exponentially in recent years.

    “Although PPMs have grown exponentially in the last few years”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Trust is often fundamental to ensuring that new ways of doing business are adopted by consumers.

    “Consumer trust is often fundamental to ensuring that new ways of doing business are adopted by consumers, for the benefit of consumers and businesses alike.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Participants on both sides of a peer platform transaction may be individuals with little information about each other, except for the information available from the platform itself.

    “This is because participants on both sides of the transaction may be individuals with little information about each other, except for the information available from the platform itself.”
3 of 3

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

4 of 4

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
OECD
Corresponding author
OECD
Venue
OECD Digital Economy Papers
Published
2017-11-07
ISSN
2071-6826 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4236356504
Cited by
19
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3
Type
report
Language
en
Open access
Locations
OECD digital economy papers (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Sharing Economy and Platforms
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Digital Platforms and Economics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Economy and Work Transformation
Keywords
consumer trust, consumer protection, peer-to-peer platforms, trust mechanisms, consumer behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-11, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-11 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review