Cited by 56Green IT and SustainabilityICT Impact and PoliciesSmart Cities and Technologies

Greener and Smarter: ICTs, the Environment and Climate Change

Open access
Arthur Mickoleit·2010·OECD Green Growth Papers

Abstract

Information and communication technologies (ICTs) are a key enabler of “green growth” in all sectors of the economy. They are a key part of government strategies for a sustainable economic recovery. This report looks at how ICTs can improve their own environmental performance, and how they can be used to improve environmental performance throughout the economy and society. Direct environmental impacts of ICTs are considerable in areas such as energy use, materials throughput and end-of-life treatment. Government “green ICT” policies can be instrumental in promoting life-cycle approaches for improved R&D and design of ICT goods, services and systems. Innovative ICT applications enable sustainable production and consumption across the entire economy. The potential for improving environmental performance targets specific products, but also entire systems and industry sectors, e.g. construction, transport, energy.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1787/5k9h3635kdbt-en

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several studies suggest that the application of digital devices and programs can increase efficiencies in agriculture, transport, and industrial production.

    “Regarding the potential of ICT to save energy and resources, several studies suggest that the application of digital devices and programs can increase e ciencies in several areas, including the important sectors agriculture, transport, and industrial production, e.g., [28,131].”

    From Digitalization and the Decoupling Debate: Can ICT Help to Reduce Environmental Impacts While the Economy Keeps Growing? (2020) · cites this paper as [131]

    The Enabling impacts section says ICT applications can make production and consumption more resource-efficient, and the Transport section gives examples of potential efficiency gains. The Systemic impacts section mentions precision farming only as an area for future study; it does not establish an efficiency gain in agriculture. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 24 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. Choi, B.C. et al. (2006), "Life Cycle Assessment of a Personal Computer and its Effective Recycling Rate", The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 11(2), pp. 122-128.
  2. Darby, S. (2006), "The Effectiveness of Feedback on Energy Consumption. A review for DEFRA of the literature on metering, billing and direct displays", Environmental Change Institute, Oxford.
  3. Dubus, L. (2010), "Practices, Needs an Impediments in the Use of Weather/Climate Information in the Electricity Energy Sector", Management of Weather and Climate Risk in the Energy Industry, A. Troccoli (ed.), Springer, pp. 175-188.
  4. Greenpeace (2008), "Toxic Tech: Not in Our Backyard", www.greenpeace.org/raw/content/international/press/reports/not-in-our-backyard.pdf.
  5. Hischier, R., P. Wäger and J. Gauglhofer (2005), "Does WEEE Recycling Make Sense from an Environmental Perspective?: The Environmental Impacts of the Swiss take-back and Recycling Systems for Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE)", Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 25(5), p.
  6. IEA (2009b), Energy Statistics of OECD Countries, 2009 edition, OECD/IEA, Paris.
  7. IEA (2009c), Energy Statistics of Non-OECD Countries, 2009 edition, OECD/IEA, Paris.
  8. IEA (2009d), Electricity Information, 2009 edition, OECD/IEA, Paris.
  9. IPCC (International Panel on Climate Change) (2007), Climate Change 2007. Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, R.K. Pachauri and A. Reisinger (eds.), IPCC, Geneva.
  10. Karl, T.R., J.M. Melillo and T.C. Peterson (2009), Global Climate Change Impacts in the United States, Cambridge UP, Cambridge.
  11. Kitamura, R. et al. (1991), "Telecommuting as a Transportation Planning Measure: Initial Results of California Pilot Project, Ryuichi Kitamura Reprint No. 58 of California", Transportation Research Record, 1285, pp. 98-104.
  12. Malmodin, J., A. Moberg, D. Lundén, G. Finnveden and N. Lövehagen, "Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Operational Electricity Use in the ICT and Entertainment & Media Sectors", submitted to Journal of Industrial Ecology, draft kindly provided by the author.
  13. McDonough, W. and M. Braungart (2002), Cradle to Cradle: Remaking the Way We Make Things, North Point Press, New York.
  14. Owen, W. (1962), "Transportation and Technology", The American Economic Review 52(2).
  15. Samaras, C. and K. Meisterling (2008), "Life Cycle Assessment of Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Plug- in Hybrid Vehicles: Implications for Policy", Environmental Science & Technology, 42(9), pp. 3170-3176.
  16. UNU (United Nations University) (2008), 2008 Review of Directive 2002/96 on Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE), United Nations University, Bonn.
  17. Zuleta, J.C. (2010), "The Future of the Lithium Market", paper presented at the Lithium Supply and Markets conference, Las Vegas, NV, USA, January.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mickoleit, A.
Affiliations
Organisation de Coopération et de Développement Economiques (FR)
Corresponding author
Arthur Mickoleit
Venue
OECD Green Growth Papers
Published
2010-09-01
ISSN
2226-0935 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1824191100
Cited by
56
References
24
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 9
Type
report
Language
en
Open access
Locations
OECD green growth papers (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Green IT and Sustainability
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Media Technology › ICT Impact and Policies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Media Technology › Smart Cities and Technologies
Keywords
green ICT, information and communication technologies, environmental performance, green growth, sustainable economic recovery, energy consumption, end-of-life treatment, life cycle approach, sustainable consumption and production

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review