The Nature of Learning: Using Research to Inspire Practice
Abstract
Michael Schneider and Elsbeth Stern place acquisition at the very heart of the learning process, albeit that the quality of the is as necessary as the quantity and that knowledge should be understood much more broadly than (but including) knowing facts. They summarise the cognitive perspective through ten cornerstones. Learning: i) is essentially carried out by the learner; ii) should take prior importantly into account; iii) requires the integration of structures; iv) balances the acquisition of concepts, skills and meta-cognitive competence; v) builds complex structures by hierarchically organising more basic pieces of knowledge; vi) can valuably use structures in the external world for organising structures in the mind; vii) is constrained by the capacity limitations of human information-processing; viii) results from a dynamic interplay of emotion, motivation and cognition; ix) should develop transferable structures; x) requires time and effort.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cites
The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance
Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R. T., & Tesch-Römer, C. (1993) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.100.3.363 · Cited by 9,564 · see citing works
When and where do we apply what we learn?: A taxonomy for far transfer
Barnett, S. M., & Ceci, S. J. (2002) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.128.4.612 · Cited by 2,076 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
When Problem Solving Followed by Instruction Works: Evidence for Productive Failure
Sinha, T., & Kapur, M. (2021) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543211019105 · Cited by 212 · see citing works
“The generation of multiple RSMs in the problem-solving phase can be considered a proxy for prior knowledge activation, a key cognitive mechanism (M. Schneider & Stern, 2010) explaining the differential benefit of preparatory learning activities (Loibl et al., 2017).”
- Authors
- OECD
- Venue
- Educational Research and Innovation
- Publisher
- OECD
- Published
- 2010-08-09
- Pages
- 69-90
- ISSN
- 2076-9660 (ISSN-L)
- 2076-9679
- OpenAlex
- W4952824
- Cited by
- 61
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 8.39
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Educational research and innovation (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational methodologies and cognitive development
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
- Keywords
- knowledge acquisition, prior knowledge, knowledge integration, metacognitive skills, concept learning, knowledge hierarchies, transfer of learning, student-centered learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review