Cited by 213Global Educational Policies and ReformsLiteracy and Educational PracticesEducational Assessment and Improvement

Reading for Change: Performance and Engagement across Countries: Results from PISA 2000

Open access
OECD·2002·PISA

Abstract

Following the initial report on the results of the first PISA survey, this report looks more closely at performance in reading. It shows reading literacy levels of students aged 15, in 32 countries, in terms of how well they can use written materials to meet the challenges of the real world and to become lifelong learners. This book will help readers understand better the factors associated with reading well in the modern world.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1787/9789264099289-en

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Reading could encourage healthy behaviours in young people by enhancing academic success.

    “Indirectly, reading could also encourage healthy behaviours in young people by enhancing academic success (OECD, 2002) and reducing the risk of depression (Dowrick et al., 2012), which are in turn associated with a healthy diet (Doku et al., 2011; Gillen et al., 2012), lower cigarette, alcohol, and drug use (Stone et al., 2012), and higher physical activity (Roshanaei-moghaddam et al., 2009).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
OECD
Corresponding author
OECD
Venue
PISA
Publisher
OECD
Published
2002-11-19
ISSN
  • 1990-8539 (ISSN-L)
  • 1996-3777
OpenAlex
W4229975645
Cited by
213
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.62
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Programme for international student assessment/Internationale Schulleistungsstudie (publishedVersion)
  • DIAL (Catholic University of Leuven) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Global Educational Policies and Reforms
  • Social Sciences › Education › Literacy and Educational Practices
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Educational Assessment and Improvement
Keywords
reading literacy, student engagement, PISA, International Adult Literacy Survey, prose literacy, cross-national comparison, reading for understanding

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review