Cited by 246Reading and Literacy DevelopmentInnovative Teaching and Learning MethodsEducational Strategies and Epistemologies

Using self-regulation as a framework for implementing strategy instruction to foster reading comprehension

Souvignier, Elmar, Mokhlesgerami, Judith·2006·Learning and Instruction

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2005.12.006

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 45 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Souvignier, E., & Mokhlesgerami, J.
Affiliations
Goethe University Frankfurt (DE)
Corresponding author
Souvignier, Elmar
Venue
Learning and Instruction
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-02
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
57-71
ISSN
0959-4752 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2033138442
Cited by
246
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 14
FWCI
15.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Learning and Instruction (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
Keywords
student self-regulation, reading comprehension, reading strategy instruction, cognitive self-regulation, motivational self-regulation, motivational orientation, fifth grade students, strategy use

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review