The DOI matches its Crossref record; 467 of the 467 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
PISA 2018 Assessment and Analytical Framework
Open accessAbstract
This publication presents the theory underlying the PISA 2018 assessment -the seventh since the programme's inception.It includes frameworks for assessing the three core subjects of reading, mathematics and science (Chapters 2, 3 and 4, respectively), the framework for the third assessment of students' financial literacy (Chapter 5), and the framework for assessing the innovative domain, global competence (Chapter 6).These chapters outline the knowledge content that students need to acquire in each domain, the processes that students need to be able to perform, and the contexts in which this knowledge and these skills are applied.They also discuss how each domain is assessed.The publication concludes with the frameworks for the various questionnaires distributed to students, school principals, parents and teachers (Chapter 7), and the framework for the new well-being questionnaire distributed to students (Chapter 8). Box 1.1. Key features of PISA 2018The content PISA not only assesses whether students can reproduce knowledge, but also whether they can extrapolate from what they have learned and apply their knowledge in new situations.It emphasises the mastery of processes, the understanding of concepts, and the ability to function in various types of situations.The PISA 2018 survey focused on reading, with mathematics and science as minor domains of assessment.For the first time, global competence was assessed as an innovative domain.PISA 2018 also included an assessment of young people's financial literacy, which was optional for countries and economies. The studentsApproximately 710 000 students completed the PISA 2018 assessment, representing over 31 million 15-year-olds in the schools of the 79 participating countries and economies. The assessmentComputer-based tests were used, with assessments lasting a total of two hours for each student.Test items were a mixture of multiple-choice questions and questions requiring students to construct their own responses.The items were organised in groups based on a passage setting out a real-life situation.About 930 minutes of test items were used, with different students taking different combinations of test items.Students also answered a background questionnaire that took 35 minutes to complete.The questionnaire sought information about the students themselves, their homes, and their school and learning experiences.School principals completed a questionnaire that covered the school system and the learning environment.To obtain additional information, some countries/economies decided to distribute a questionnaire to teachers to learn about their training and professional development, their teaching practices and their job satisfaction.In some countries/economies, optional questionnaires were distributed to parents, who were asked to provide information on their perceptions of and involvement in their child's school, their support for learning in the home, and their own engagement with reading and with other cultures.CHAPTER 1. WHAT IS PISA? │ 13
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037//0003-066x.55.1.68 · Cited by 54,599
Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales.
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063 · Cited by 32,433
Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7 · Cited by 26,772
Self-efficacy: the exercise of control
(1997) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.35-1826 · Cited by 24,281
On Happiness and Human Potentials: A Review of Research on Hedonic and Eudaimonic Well-Being
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.141 · Cited by 11,567
Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach.
Davis, M. H. (1983) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.113 · Cited by 10,272
Assessment and Classroom Learning
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998) · Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice · doi:10.1080/0969595980050102 · Cited by 8,152
Mindset: The New Psychology of Success
(2006) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.44-2397 · Cited by 7,804
Grit: perseverance and passion for long-term goals
Duckworth, A. L., Peterson, C., Matthews, M. D., & Kelly, D. R. (2007) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.92.6.1087 · Cited by 6,911
(1991) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.28-5764 · Cited by 6,847
Cited by
PISA 2018 Results (Volume I): What Students Know and Can Do
OECD (2019) · PISA · doi:10.1787/5f07c754-en · Cited by 2,350
Self-citation(2009) · Programme for international student assessment/Internationale Schulleistungsstudie · doi:10.1787/19963777 · Cited by 441
21st-Century Readers: Developing Literacy Skills in a Digital World
OECD (2021) · PISA · doi:10.1787/a83d84cb-en · Cited by 337
Self-citationTen competencies for the science misinformation crisis
Allchin, D. (2023) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.21746 · Cited by 62
Altamura, L., Vargas, C., & Salmerón, L. (2025) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543231216463 · Cited by 59
Metadata
- Authors
- OECD
- Venue
- PISA
- Publisher
- OECD Publishing
- Published
- 2019-04-26
- ISSN
- 1990-8539 (ISSN-L)
- 1996-3777
- OpenAlex
- W4230616807
- Cited by
- 1,614
- References
- 467
- FWCI
- 199.15
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: PISA 2018 Assessment and Analytical Framework. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1787/b25efab8-en
- The paper
- OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 Assessment and Analytical Framework. PISA. https://doi.org/10.1787/b25efab8-en
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.