Acceptance-based behavior therapy for social anxiety disorder using videoconferencing
Open accessAbstract
Social anxiety disorder (SAD) is one of the most common psychiatric disorders in the United States (Grant et al., 2005; Kessler, Berglund, Demler, Jin, & Walters, 2005). Without treatment, SAD follows a chronic, unremitting course (Grant, et al., 2005), and is associated with high personal costs including decreased quality of life, work productivity, and quality of social relationships (Lipsitz & Schneier, 2000). However, more than 80% of people with SAD do not receive any type of treatment (Grant, et al., 2005), despite the existence of empirically supported cognitive behavioral treatments. Some individuals with SAD are unwilling to seek treatment in person due to their fears of social interaction, but may be willing to engage in remote treatment. Also, because CBT therapists are clustered around metropolitan areas, individuals living in non-metropolitan areas of the country have limited or no access to CBT therapists competent in the treatment of SAD. Interventions conducted through electronic communication media, such as the internet, have the potential to reach individuals who otherwise would not receive CBT. Videoconferencing technology potentially holds great promise in the widespread delivery of CBT. This uncontrolled pilot study assessed the feasibility, acceptability, and initial efficacy of an acceptance-based CBT intervention using Skype videoconferencing to treat adults with generalized SAD. Participants received 12 sessions of weekly therapy and were assessed at pre-treatment, mid-treatment, and post-treatment. Participants and therapists rated this treatment using Skype as acceptable and feasible. Most technical difficulties did not significantly impact the quality of the sessions. Analyses showed significant pre- to post-treatment improvements in social anxiety symptoms, depression, disability, and quality of life, with effect sizes comparable to or larger than previously published results of studies delivering in-person CBT for SAD. Implications and future directions are discussed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Yuen et al. (2010) employed videoconferencing as a medium in the delivery of ACT for 24 participants and found results across both clinician and self-rated performance in line with the aforementioned equivalent face-to-face therapeutic programmes.
“Yuen et al. (2010) employed videoconferencing as a medium in the delivery of ACT for 24 participants and found results across both clinician and self-rated performance in line with the aforementioned equivalent face-to-face therapeutic programmes”
From Acceptance and Commitment Therapy in the treatment of anxiety: A systematic review (2013) · cites this paper as Yuen et al., 2010
At posttreatment these three studies found that 44-54% of patients no longer met diagnostic criteria for SAD.
“At posttreatment these three studies found that 44 -54% of patients no longer met diagnostic criteria for SAD.”
From Acceptance and Commitment Therapy in the treatment of anxiety: A systematic review (2013) · cites this paper as Yuen et al., 2010
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Acceptance and Commitment Therapy as a Treatment for Anxiety and Depression
Twohig, M. P., & Levin, M. E. (2017) · Psychiatric Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.psc.2017.08.009 · Cited by 268 · see citing works
Acceptance and Commitment Therapy in the treatment of anxiety: A systematic review
Swain, J., Hancock, K., Hainsworth, C., & Bowman, J. (2013) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2013.07.002 · Cited by 207 · see citing works
How Psychological Telehealth Can Alleviate Society's Mental Health Burden: A Literature Review
Perle, J. G., & Nierenberg, B. P. (2013) · Journal of Technology in Human Services · doi:10.1080/15228835.2012.760332 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Ricketts, E. J., Bauer, C. C., Ran, D., Himle, M. B., & Woods, D. W. (2014) · Cognitive and Behavioral Practice · doi:10.1016/j.cbpra.2014.09.003 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Effectiveness of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy on Mental Health Issues: A Systematic Review
Aravind, A., Agarwal, M., Malhotra, S., & Ayyub, S. (2024) · Annals of Neurosciences · doi:10.1177/09727531241300741 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
- Authors
- Yuen, E. K., & Herbert, J. D.
- Affiliations
- University of Dhaka (BD)
- Drexel University (US)
- ORCID
- Yuen, Erica K.
- Publisher
- Drexel University Libraries
- Published
- 2010-11-01
- OpenAlex
- W4205303363
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2
- Type
- dissertation
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- iDEA - Drexel University Institutional Repository (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
- Keywords
- social anxiety disorder, videoconferencing, Skype, online therapy, treatment feasibility, treatment acceptability, depression, quality of life, disability, access to mental health care
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review