Cited by 10Medical and Health Sciences ResearchThoreau and American LiteratureHealth, Medicine and Society

Physicians and patients who “friend” or “tweet”: constructing a legal framework for social networking in a highly regulated domain

Open access
Terry, Nicolas P.·2010·Indiana Law Review

Abstract

Conclusion 340 "IfRelationship George walks through this door, he will kill Independent George!A George divided against itself cannot stand!" 1 5 Although teenagers and young adults remain the dominant groups using social network sites, adult usage quadrupled between 2005 and 2008 6 as adults migrated to Facebook and MySpace initially, perhaps, to connect with their children and grandchildren.7 By December 2008, 35% of online adults had used a social network site.8Of course, all users do not equally enjoy all social network activities.For example, updating one's personal status using Twitter or Facebook' s "What's on your mind?" feature continues to be an activity 1 .

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.18060/4040

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Online content can be discovered and exploited despite privacy settings and used against a person in a privacy-violation lawsuit.

    “it has been reported that a content shared online could be found and exploited, no matter what your privacy setting was, and be used against you in a suit filed in a possible violation of privacy.23”

    From Social media and Internet usage of orthopaedic surgeons (2017) · cites this paper as [23]

  • Terry warns that any personalized response may imply the creation of a physician-patient relationship even if a disclaimer is given.

    “Terry warns that any personalized response may imply the creation of a physician-patient relationship regardless of whether a disclaimer is given.”
  • Content posted on social networks is discoverable regardless of privacy settings and can be used to judge a person's character in lawsuits.

    “Content posted on social networks, regardless of whether privacy settings are used, is discoverable and can be used to judge an individual's character in lawsuits.”

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Terry, N. P.
Affiliations
Indiana University Bloomington (US)
Corresponding author
Terry, Nicolas P.
Venue
Indiana Law Review
Published
2010-01-02
Volume
43
Issue
2
Pages
285-342
ISSN
  • 0090-4198 (ISSN-L)
  • 2169-320X
OpenAlex
W155392367
Cited by
10
References
1
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2
FWCI
0.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Indiana Law Review (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Indiana Law Review (publishedVersion)
  • Purdue University Indianapolis (Indiana University) (submittedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (submittedVersion)
  • IUScholarWorks (Indiana University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Medical and Health Sciences Research
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Thoreau and American Literature
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health, Medicine and Society
Keywords
physician-patient relationship, social networking, Twitter, online health information, privacy, confidentiality, personal health records, electronic health records, computer-mediated communication, health information protection, professional boundaries, health law

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review