Metaphorically Speaking: Ableist Metaphors in Feminist Writing
Open accessAbstract
This article examines the use of metaphors of disability in feminist texts. Starting from an understanding of feminism as a movement to end sex and gender oppression in the lives of all people, a movement aligned with anti-racist, anti-homophobic, anti-classist and anti-ableist movements, I make connections between sexist and ableist rhetoric in order to expose the political and intellectual repercussions for feminist work that relies upon metaphors of disability. I argue that most current uses of disability metaphors promote an ideology of impairment as a negative form of embodiment. In order to articulate my claims, I provide a close reading of extended disability metaphors used in work by bell hooks and Tania Modleski, identifying the implications about disability and problems that occur in their overall arguments when the metaphors are read from a disability studies perspective. The article ends by offering recommendations for a feminist philosophy of language, calling for a reflective political commitment by feminists to interrogate our theoretical assumptions and consider the effects of our language so as to prevent further marginalization of disempowered groups in general and disabled people in particular.Keywords: metaphor; language; ableism; feminism
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
When used in everyday discourse, disabilities are metaphors for weaknesses or limitations.
“Often, when used in everyday discourse, disabilities are metaphors for weaknesses or limitations (Schalk 2013).”
From Conceptualizing color-evasiveness: using dis/ability critical race theory to expand a color-blind racial ideology in education and society (2017) · cites this paper as Schalk 2013
Cites
Austin, J. L. (1975) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198245537.001.0001 · Cited by 21,496 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Annamma, S. A., Jackson, D. D., & Morrison, D. (2017) · Race Ethnicity and Education · doi:10.1080/13613324.2016.1248837 · Cited by 738 · see citing works
Race and Disability: From Analogy to Intersectionality
Frederick, A., & Shifrer, D. (2019) · Sociology of Race and Ethnicity · doi:10.1177/2332649218783480 · Cited by 203 · see citing works
- Authors
- Schalk, S.
- Affiliations
- Indiana University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Schalk, Sami
- Venue
- Disability Studies Quarterly
- Publisher
- The Ohio State University Libraries
- Published
- 2013-09-05
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 4
- ISSN
- 1041-5718 (ISSN-L)
- 2159-8371
- OpenAlex
- W1601006678
- Cited by
- 93
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2
- FWCI
- 8.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- Locations
- Disability Studies Quarterly (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Rights and Representation
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Feminist Theory and Gender Studies
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
- Keywords
- ableism, feminist literature, disability studies, bell hooks, embodiment, feminist rhetoric
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review