Cited by 93Disability Rights and RepresentationFeminist Theory and Gender StudiesGender and Feminist Studies

Metaphorically Speaking: Ableist Metaphors in Feminist Writing

Open access
Schalk, Sami·2013·Disability Studies Quarterly

Abstract

This article examines the use of metaphors of disability in feminist texts. Starting from an understanding of feminism as a movement to end sex and gender oppression in the lives of all people, a movement aligned with anti-racist, anti-homophobic, anti-classist and anti-ableist movements, I make connections between sexist and ableist rhetoric in order to expose the political and intellectual repercussions for feminist work that relies upon metaphors of disability. I argue that most current uses of disability metaphors promote an ideology of impairment as a negative form of embodiment. In order to articulate my claims, I provide a close reading of extended disability metaphors used in work by bell hooks and Tania Modleski, identifying the implications about disability and problems that occur in their overall arguments when the metaphors are read from a disability studies perspective. The article ends by offering recommendations for a feminist philosophy of language, calling for a reflective political commitment by feminists to interrogate our theoretical assumptions and consider the effects of our language so as to prevent further marginalization of disempowered groups in general and disabled people in particular.Keywords: metaphor; language; ableism; feminism

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.18061/dsq.v33i4.3874

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schalk, S.
Affiliations
Indiana University (US)
Corresponding author
Schalk, Sami
Venue
Disability Studies Quarterly
Published
2013-09-05
Volume
33
Issue
4
ISSN
  • 1041-5718 (ISSN-L)
  • 2159-8371
OpenAlex
W1601006678
Cited by
93
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2
FWCI
8.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
Disability Studies Quarterly (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Rights and Representation
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Feminist Theory and Gender Studies
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
Keywords
ableism, feminist literature, disability studies, bell hooks, embodiment, feminist rhetoric

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review