Crop physiology of fibre hemp (Cannabis sativa L.)
Open accessAbstract
Fibre hemp ( Cannabis sativa L.) may be an alternative to wood as a raw material for the production of paper pulp. The effects of enviromnental factors and cultural measures on the functioning, yield and quality of fibre hemp crops in the Netherlands were investigated.Until flowering (generally in August), the radiation use efficiency (RUE, above-ground dry matter accumulated per unit of photosynthetically active radiation intercepted) of hemp was 2.2 g MJ -1, after flowering it dropped to 1.1 g MJ -1, This reduction was mainly caused by senescence, resulting in a lower rate of canopy photosynthesis. When flowering was prevented by artificial daylength extension the RUE remained high throughout September, and stem dry matter yield was increased by 2.7 t ha -1. Breeding late-flowering hemp seems a promising stategy to improve the stem yield potential of hemp.Hemp grows at low temperatures, its base temperature is 1 °C for leaf appearance, and 2.5 °C for canopy establishment. Thermal time is a simple and accurate tool to describe leaf appearance and light interception in field-grown fibre hemp.Hemp is grown at high plant densities to improve stem quality and to increase the allocation of above-ground dry matter to the stem. However, in dense hemp crops self-thinning (densityinduced mortality) may occur, causing losses of dry matter. It was established that in fibre hemp optimum plant density is approximated by the highest density possible without inducing self-thinning. During self-thinning an increase in biomass is accompanied by a reduction in plant density, consequently, in fibre hemp optimum plant density is a function of yield.N fertilization affected self-thinning: at similar above-ground dry matter, a higher plant density was sustained at 80 than at 200 kg N ha -1. The reduced mortality at the low nitrogen level resulted from a shift from mainly competition for light, which enhances differences in plant size, to competition for nutrients, which does not give large plants a disproportionate advantage over small plants. Variability of both weight and height of hemp plants was higher at 200 than at 80 kg ha -1N, and more suppressed plants were present at 200 than at 80 kg ha -1N. Sexual dimorphism contributed to variability of height and weight, but the effects were smaller than those of nitrogen fertilization.It is concluded that fibre hemp may be an interesting 'new' crop for arable farmers in the Netherlands: hemp may be profitable, its stems potentially have a large non-food market, the crop requires little or no biocide and suppresses weeds and some major soil-borne diseases.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Climate and the efficiency of crop production in Britain
Monteith, J. L. (1977) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.1977.0140 · Cited by 3,484 · see citing works
The Quantitative Relationships Between Plant Population And Crop Yield
Willey, R. W., & Heath, S. B. (1969) · Advances in Agronomy · doi:10.1016/s0065-2113(08)60100-5 · Cited by 310 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Agronomy of fibre hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) in Europe.
Struik, P. C., Amaducci, S., Bullard, M. J., Stutterheim, N. C., Venturi, G., & Cromack, H. T. H. (2000) · Industrial Crops and Products · doi:10.1016/s0926-6690(99)00048-5 · Cited by 402 · see citing works
Adesina, I., Bhowmik, A., Sharma, H., & Shahbazi, A. (2020) · Agriculture · doi:10.3390/agriculture10040129 · Cited by 324 · see citing works
Basak, M., Broadway, M., Lewis, J., Starkey, H., Bloomquist, M., Peszlen, I., Davis, J., Lucia, L. A., & Pal, L. (2025) · BioResources · doi:10.15376/biores.20.2.basak · Cited by 22 · see citing works
- Authors
- van der Werf, H.
- Publisher
- Wageningen University and Research
- Published
- 1994-01-01
- OpenAlex
- W2649289
- Cited by
- 52
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
- Type
- dissertation
- Language
- es
- Open access
- green
- research.wur.nl
- Locations
- Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (acceptedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Crop Yield and Soil Fertility
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Plant Growth and Agriculture Techniques
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Weed Control and Herbicide Applications
- Keywords
- fiber hemp, Cannabis sativa, crop physiology, radiation use efficiency, canopy photosynthesis, senescence, flowering time, thermal time, plant density, self-thinning, nitrogen fertilization, light competition, nutrient competition, stem yield, stem quality, weed suppression, crop diversification, sexual dimorphism, biomass allocation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review