Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 35

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Students’ Sourcing While Reading and Writing From Multiple Web Documents

Strømsø, Helge I., Bråten, Ivar·2014·Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy
DOI 10.18261/issn1891-943x-2014-02-02
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This study focuses on how and to what degree undergraduates attend to source information while reading a set of partly contradicting web documents on a social-scientific issue, and on how students use those sources in writing an essay based on the documents. Think-aloud data collected during the reading session showed that students to some degree pay attention to both source information about the documents and to information about sources embedded in the documents’ content. Sourcing of an evaluative nature occurred most frequently while students read documents holding strong opinions on the issue. In the essays, students most frequently cited the source assumed to be most trustworthy. Students’ explicit online sourcing while reading was significantly related to their explicit references to the web documents in the essays. The results from the study are in accordance with prior studies in indicating that undergraduates need more training in sourcing skills. Keywords Sourcing multiple documents digital literacy critical reading

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.18261/issn1891-943x-2014-02-02

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 29 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Johnson M.K. & Mitchell K.J. (2002). Source monitoring. In J.H. Byrne (Ed.) Learning & Memory (2nd ed. pp. 628–631). New York: Macmillan Reference USA.

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Strømsø, H. I., & Bråten, I.
Venue
Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy
Publisher
Scandinavian University Press
Published
2014-06-13
Volume
9
Issue
2
Pages
92-111
ISSN
  • 0809-6724
  • 1891-943X
DOI
10.18261/issn1891-943x-2014-02-02
Cited by
35
References
29
Language
no

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.