Cited by 1Nutrition, Health and Food BehaviorNutritional Studies and DietNutrition and Health Studies

Manual fotográfico de porciones para cuantificación alimentaria del Ecuador, 2.a ed.

Herrera Fontana, María Elisa, Chisaguano, Maribel, Vayas, Gabriela, Crispim, Sandra Patricia·2022

Abstract

El manual ha sido elaborado para facilitar la actividad del profesional de la salud que trabaja en estudiar los patrones alimentarios de la población adulta ecuatoriana. Se desarrolló con el objetivo de facilitar la realización de las encuestas alimentarias al proporcionar un recurso visual adecuado para que la población entrevistada pueda determinar el tamaño de la porción de los alimentos que consume.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.18272/usfqpress.m43

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Herrera Fontana, M. E., Chisaguano, M., Vayas, G., & Crispim, S. P.
Affiliations
Universidad San Francisco de Quito (EC)
Publisher
USFQ PRESS
Published
2022
OpenAlex
W4410490364
Cited by
1
References
0
Citations by year
2023: 1
FWCI
0.43
Type
book
Language
es
Open access
closed
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutrition and Health Studies
Keywords
portion size estimation, dietary assessment, dietary surveys, dietary habits, visual aids, adults

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review