The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Using dynamic schemas for query optimization over JSON data.
Abstract
Query optimization in document stores has traditionally relied on rule-based approaches, but recent research advocates for a shift towards cost-based optimization. However, this transition is hindered by the fragmented nature of existing approaches, stemming from the early development stage of cost-based query optimization for document databases. A key challenge lies in the absence of a standardized query language and semantics, exacerbated by the diverse and schema-less nature of JSON document collections. To tackle these challenges, the literature has proposed dynamic schemas, primarily utilized at parsing time. However, these schemas lack a formal foundation that describes meaningful semantics for query optimization. This thesis proposes a novel framework based on a relational-like plan, employing an algebra to internally represent queries. By manipulating algebra expressions, multiple plans are generated and subsequently evaluated for cost. Specifically tailored to JSON data, the thesis introduces a document algebra designed to accommodate JSON characteristics. Additionally, it formalizes a dynamic schema concept termed Data Pilot, inspired by XML DataGuides. An algebra over Data Pilots is presented, facilitating cardinality estimation without executing operations, aiding in query optimization. Furthermore, the thesis proposes a strategy to determine when query rewriting using Document Algebra properties may be advantageous. Experimental validation demonstrates the feasib…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Llano-Rios (2024) notes that the absence of standardised query optimisation for semi-structured object storage can lead to query execution times up to 40% slower than in equivalent relational workloads when dataset sizes exceed 10 GB.”
From A REVIEW ON OBJECT-ORIENTED, OBJECT-RELATIONAL, RELATIONAL, AND NOSQL DATABASES: EVOLUTION, INTEGRATION, AND PERFORMANCE TRADE-OFFS (2025) · cites this paper as Llano-Rios, 2024
In the citing paper
“Data migration between models often requires complex schema mapping, conflict resolution, and transformation logic, particularly when moving between strongly typed relational schemas and schema-flexible NoSQL stores (Llano-Rios, 2024).”
From A REVIEW ON OBJECT-ORIENTED, OBJECT-RELATIONAL, RELATIONAL, AND NOSQL DATABASES: EVOLUTION, INTEGRATION, AND PERFORMANCE TRADE-OFFS (2025) · cites this paper as Llano-Rios, 2024
In the citing paper
“Llano-Rios (2024) has observed that dynamic schema adaptation based on JSON can save up to 30% of the manual mapping cost”
From A REVIEW ON OBJECT-ORIENTED, OBJECT-RELATIONAL, RELATIONAL, AND NOSQL DATABASES: EVOLUTION, INTEGRATION, AND PERFORMANCE TRADE-OFFS (2025) · cites this paper as Llano-Rios (2024)
In the citing paper
“but finds it difficult to cope with the complex constraints of relational schemes like composite keys and nested joins.”
From A REVIEW ON OBJECT-ORIENTED, OBJECT-RELATIONAL, RELATIONAL, AND NOSQL DATABASES: EVOLUTION, INTEGRATION, AND PERFORMANCE TRADE-OFFS (2025) · cites this paper as Llano-Rios (2024)
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Okoronkwo, M. C., Mustapha, M., Markus, C., Adaji, M. A., & Chibunze, N. E. (2025) · Open Journal of Physical Science (ISSN: 2734-2123) · doi:10.52417/ojps.v6i2.1039
Metadata
- Authors
- Llano-Rios, T.
- Publisher
- University of Louisville
- Published
- 2024-01-01
- OpenAlex
- W4400683456
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1
- Type
- dissertation
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository (University of Louisville) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Advanced Database Systems and Queries
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Data Management and Algorithms
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Data Mining Algorithms and Applications
- Keywords
- query optimization, JSON data, document-oriented databases, dynamic schema, cost-based optimization, cardinality estimation, query rewriting, schema-less data
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review