Cited by 4Death, Funerary Practices, and MourningCrime and Detective Fiction StudiesLiterary Theory and Cultural Hermeneutics

W imię zmarłych: humanistyka forensycznej wrażliwości i publicznej prawdomówności

Open access
Sendyka, Roma·2017·Teksty Drugie

Abstract

1. W imię zmarłych: praktyki forensyczneTłumaczenie słowa „forensyczny” stało się ostatnio łatwiejsze dzięki kulturze masowej: seriale łączące tradycje kryminału i nową poetykę laboratoryjną wypełniły naszą wyobraźnię odpowiednimi odnośnikami. Kryminalistyka, dochodzenie sądowe – trudno dostrzec, jakie ewentualne korzyści miałaby odnieść współczesna humanistyka, spoglądając w stronę tych szczególnie wyspecjalizowanych i zaawansowanych badań. A jednak coraz częściej słychać o nadchodzącym zwr...

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.18318/td.2017.1.6

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In Disco Elysium, the relationship with objects is reversible, mutual, and cannot be reduced to a simple one-sided investigation.

    “Similarly, to Doyle's stories, object gives rise to thought, but Disco Elysium supplements this notion with another dimension, as the relationship with the objects turns out to be reversible, mutual (Sendyka 2017: 88), and cannot be reduced to a simple one-sided investigation.”

    From The Object Gives Rise to Thought: Hermeneutics of Objects in <i>Disco Elysium</i> (2021) · cites this paper as Sendyka 2017: 88

    In section 3 (p. 8), Sendyka says forensics is not merely a relationship between science and an object, which supports the rejection of a simple one-sided investigation. But her discussion of material witnesses in section 3 (p. 7) does not describe the relationship with objects as reversible or mutual, and it does not address Disco Elysium. (LLM, conf=0.74)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sendyka, R.
Corresponding author
Sendyka, Roma
Venue
Teksty Drugie
Published
2017
Volume
1
Pages
81-90
ISSN
0867-0633 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2794463461
Cited by
4
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
pl
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Teksty Drugie (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Jagiellonian University Repository (Jagiellonian University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • OpenEdition (OpenEdition) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • RCIN (Digital Repository of the Scientifics Institutes) (Institute of Archaeology and Ethnology of the Polish Academy of Sciences) (submittedVersion)
  • OpenEdition (OpenEdition) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Death, Funerary Practices, and Mourning
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Crime and Detective Fiction Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Literary Theory and Cultural Hermeneutics
Keywords
forensic practice, forensic anthropology, forensic linguistics, forensic odontology, forensic archaeology, forensic informatics, forensic psychiatry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review