Justice systems and ICT What can be learned from Europe?
Open accessAbstract
The Utrecht Law Review is an open-access peer-reviewed journal which aims to offer an international academic platform for cross-border legal research. In the first place, this concerns research in which the boundaries of the classic branches of the law (private law, criminal law, constitutional and administrative law, European and public international law) are crossed and connections are made between these areas of the law, amongst others from a comparative law perspective. In addition, the journal welcomes research in which classic law is brought face to face with not strictly legal disciplines such as philosophy, economics, political sciences and public administration science.The journal was established in 2005 and is affiliated to the Utrecht University School of Law. If you wish to receive e-mail alerts please join the mailing list.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Digital transformation cannot be effective or legally binding unless supported by a legislative framework that authorizes the use of technological means and legitimizes judicial procedures conducted through them.
“Digital transformation cannot be effective or legally binding unless supported by a legislative framework that authorizes the use of technological means and legitimizes judicial procedures conducted through them.23”
From Digital Transformation in the Algerian Administrative Justice System (2026) · cites this paper as [23]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Digital Transformation in the Algerian Administrative Justice System
Gheni, A. (2026) · International Journal for Court Administration · doi:10.36745/ijca.730
- Authors
- Velicogna, M.
- Affiliations
- National Research Council (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Velicogna, Marco
- ORCID
- Velicogna, Marco
- Venue
- Utrecht Law Review
- Publisher
- Utrecht University School of Law
- Published
- 2007-06-18
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 129
- ISSN
- 1871-515X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2103185834
- Cited by
- 68
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 10.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Utrecht Law Review (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Education, Law, and Society
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Artificial Intelligence in Law
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › European Criminal Justice and Data Protection
- Keywords
- justice system, information and communication technologies, e-justice, digitalization of courts, European experience
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
