La influencia de las TIC en el desempeño académico: evidencia de la prueba PIRLS en Colombia 2011
Open accessAbstract
lector de niños de cuarto de primaria, utilizando la prueba Progreso Internacional en Competencia Lectora (pirls) de 2011 para una muestra de alumnos en Colombia. Para la estimación se utilizaron técnicas de regresión lineal múltiple, ya que permite el control de variables institucionales, familiares e individuales, para así hallar el efecto directo que tienen las tic en el puntaje promedio del estudiante. Los resultados muestran que la tenencia de tecnologías y el uso de éstas en el aprendizaje escolar mediante actividades de lectura de contenido digital, afectan positivamente el desempeño lector de los niños, incrementando el puntaje promedio entre un 21% y un 31%. Asimismo, el uso de computador (PC) para efectos de mejorar la lectura aporta un 32% adicional en la calificación de la prueba respecto a los niños que no usan PC para esto, siendo la variable de mayor peso. No obstante, se hace énfasis en el uso adecuado de las tic, ya que su utilización llana tanto en el hogar como en el colegio puede afectar negativamente el desempeño dado que se utilizan para otros objetivos fuera del escolar. Palabras clave: Colombia, desempeño lector, educación primaria, pirls, tic.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Some studies evidenced positive associations between digital reading frequency and reading comprehension in adolescents and college students.
“Some studies evidenced positive associations between digital reading frequency and reading comprehension in adolescents (Botello-Peñaloza & López-Alba, 2014; Duncan et al., 2016; Islam et al., 2020; Jackson et al., 2011; Johnson, 2013; Kong et al., 2022; Wu & Peng, 2017) as well as in college students (Amiama-Espaillat & Mayor-Ruiz, 2017; Chen & Fang, 2013; Mežek, 2013).”
From Do New Forms of Reading Pay Off? A Meta-Analysis on the Relationship Between Leisure Digital Reading Habits and Text Comprehension (2025) · cites this paper as Botello-Peñaloza & López-Alba, 2014
Cites
Predictors of Academic Achievement among Homeless and Low-Income Housed Children
Buckner, J. C., Bassuk, E. L., & Weinreb, L. F. (2001) · Journal of School Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0022-4405(00)00059-5 · Cited by 130 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Altamura, L., Vargas, C., & Salmerón, L. (2025) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543231216463 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
- Authors
- Botello Peñaloza, H., & López Alba, A.
- Venue
- Academia y Virtualidad
- Publisher
- Universidad Militar Nueva Granada
- Published
- 2014-12-01
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 15
- ISSN
- 2011-0731 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1493875733
- Cited by
- 12
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 1.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- es
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- Locations
- Academia y Virtualidad (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Aaltodoc (Aalto University) (publishedVersion)
- LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- Aaltodoc (Aalto University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja) (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Innovations and Technology
- Social Sciences › Education › Education and Technology Integration
- Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
- Keywords
- information and communication technologies, academic performance, reading achievement, PIRLS, fourth grade, primary education, digital reading, technology ownership, Colombia
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review