The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Phosphorylation of basic amino acid residues in proteins: important but easily missed.
Open accessAbstract
Reversible phosphorylation is the most widespread posttranslational protein modification, playing regulatory role in almost every aspect of cell life. The majority of protein phosphorylation research has been focused on serine, threonine and tyrosine that form acid-stable phosphomonoesters. However, protein histidine, arginine and lysine residues also may undergo phosphorylation to yield acid-labile phosphoramidates, most often remaining undetected in conventional studies of protein phosphorylation. It has become increasingly evident that acid-labile protein phosphorylations play important roles in signal transduction and other regulatory processes. Beside acting as high-energy intermediates in the transfer of the phosphoryl group from donor to acceptor molecules, phosphohistidines have been found so far in histone H4, heterotrimeric G proteins, ion channel KCa3.1, annexin 1, P-selectin and myelin basic protein, as well as in recombinant thymidylate synthase expressed in bacterial cells. Phosphoarginines occur in histone H3, myelin basic protein and capsidic protein VP12 of granulosis virus, whereas phospholysine in histone H1. This overview of the current knowledge on phosphorylation of protein basic amino-acid residues takes into consideration its proved or possible roles in cell functioning. Specific requirements of studies on acid-labile protein phosphorylation are also indicated.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Advances in Fmoc solid‐phase peptide synthesis
Behrendt, R., White, P., & Offer, J. (2016) · Journal of Peptide Science · doi:10.1002/psc.2836 · Cited by 760
Prabakaran, S., Lippens, G., Steen, H., & Gunawardena, J. (2012) · WIREs Systems Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1002/wsbm.1185 · Cited by 335
Histones: At the Crossroads of Peptide and Protein Chemistry
Müller, M. M., & Muir, T. W. (2015) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr5003529 · Cited by 247
Lussier, M. P., Sanz-Clemente, A., & Roche, K. W. (2015) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.r115.652750 · Cited by 163
Metadata
- Authors
- Cieśla, J., Frączyk, T., & Rode, W.
- Venue
- Acta Biochimica Polonica
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2011-05-27
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 137-48
- ISSN
- 0001-527X (ISSN-L)
- 1734-154X
- OpenAlex
- W2079269139
- Cited by
- 190
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Phosphorylation of basic amino acid residues in proteins: important but easily missed. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.18388/abp.2011_2258
- The paper
- Cieśla, J., Frączyk, T., & Rode, W. (2011). Phosphorylation of basic amino acid residues in proteins: important but easily missed. Acta Biochimica Polonica. https://doi.org/10.18388/abp.2011_2258
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.