Cited by 19Library Science and Information LiteracyHigher Education Research StudiesLibrary Science and Information

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Linking Library to Student Retention: A Statistical Analysis

Open access
Eng, Sidney, Stadler, Derek·2015·Evidence Based Library and Information Practice

Abstract

Objective - This study analyses both library expenditure and student retention. It seeks to determine if positive correlations found in a former study endure using more recent data or if alternative interpretations can be made. It includes the associate degree-granting colleges and examines whether library instruction has a greater significance on student retention over expenditure and if library instruction at the two-year college correlates to retention. Methods - The colleges and universities included in the study grant associate, bachelor, masters, and doctoral degrees, based on Carnegie Foundation classification. Data was analysed to determine if a correlation exists between the library and student persistence. Library statistics were drawn from the Association of College and Research Libraries (ACRL) Metrics database which provides reports collected from academic institutions. When aggregated, the ACRL report yielded total library expenditures, total salaries of professional staff, the professional staff full-time equivalent (FTE), fall semester student enrolment and data from a library instruction category of ACRL surveys for associate degree-granting institutions. Results - After replicating the same mathematical approach, the single category that has remained constant for all institutions is professional staff. While the former study’s analysis suggested that a relationship between library expenditure and retention existed in every Carnegie category, this study asser…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.18438/b84p4d

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 19

Metadata

Authors
Eng, S., & Stadler, D.
Affiliations
Borough of Manhattan Community College (US)
Venue
Evidence Based Library and Information Practice
Published
2015-09-13
Volume
10
Issue
3
Pages
50-63
ISSN
1715-720X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2136660948
Cited by
19
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2
FWCI
26.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-sa
Locations
  • Evidence Based Library and Information Practice (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Library Science and Information Literacy
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
  • Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Library Science and Information
Keywords
library expenditures, student retention, library instruction, community colleges, information literacy, higher education funding, student persistence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Linking Library to Student Retention: A Statistical Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.18438/b84p4d
The paper
Eng, S., & Stadler, D. (2015). Linking Library to Student Retention: A Statistical Analysis. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice. https://doi.org/10.18438/b84p4d