The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Predicting Learning Styles Based on Students’ Learning Behaviour Using Correlation Analysis
Abstract
Past research has proposed various approaches to automatically detect students' learning styles to address problems associated with traditional research methods (i.e. questionnaire). However, results obtained through traditional research methods have issues in terms of accuracy and precision which need to be addressed. In general, the existing automatic detection approaches are only able to provide satisfactory results for specific learning style models and/or dimensions, or even only work for certain learning management systems. The aim of this study is to propose an automatic detection of learning styles from the analysis of students' learning behaviour by constructing a mathematical model. This study specifically explores the relationship between students' learning behaviour and their learning styles. To investigate this relationship, a pilot experiment was conducted with 33 students. The students used Moodle platform, a learning management system, as supplementary online learning material for Java programing. The students' learning behaviour was tracked and recorded. Thirty students' data (i.e. their learning behaviour and learning styles; measured using the Index of Learning Styles (ILS) instrument) were analysed using the proposed correlation analysis to identify the relationship. The remaining three students' learning behaviour data were used to predict their learning styles. The findings are discussed with regard to accuracy of automatic detection of learning styles using the ILS instrument.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Of the identified articles, 3% investigated learning styles—namely, Active vs Reflective, Sensitive vs Intuitive, Visual vs Verbal, Sequential vs Global—when implementing e-course content (Kouis et al., 2020; Ljubimova et al., 2015; Xiao & Rahman, 2017).”
From A systematic review on trends in using Moodle for teaching and learning (2022) · cites this paper as Xiao & Rahman, 2017
In the citing paper
“While some studies have proposed automatic detection of learning styles by analysing student's learning behaviour through mathematical models (Xiao & Rahman, 2017), other studies have developed simpler matrix systems that would allow the teacher to carry out a manual selection of tools for Moodle Learning after considering student's learning styles (Ljubimova et al., 2015; Meza-Fernández & Sepúl”
From A systematic review on trends in using Moodle for teaching and learning (2022) · cites this paper as Xiao & Rahman, 2017
In the citing paper
“While some studies have proposed automatic detection of learning styles by analysing student's learning behaviour through mathematical models (Xiao & Rahman, 2017), other studies have developed simpler matrix systems that would allow the teacher to carry out a manual selection of tools for Moodle Learning after considering student's learning styles (Ljubimova et al., 2015; Meza-Fernández & Sepúl”
From A systematic review on trends in using Moodle for teaching and learning (2022) · cites this paper as Xiao & Rahman, 2017
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A systematic review on trends in using Moodle for teaching and learning
Gamage, S. H. P. W., Ayres, J. R., & Behrend, M. B. (2022) · International Journal of STEM Education · doi:10.1186/s40594-021-00323-x · Cited by 360
Metadata
- Authors
- Xiao, L. L., & Abdul Rahman, S. S. B.
- Affiliations
- National University of Singapore (SG)
- ORCID
- Xiao, Li Ling
- Venue
- Current Science
- Publisher
- Current Science Association
- Published
- 2017-12-10
- Volume
- 113
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 2090
- ISSN
- 0011-3891 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2791634397
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3
- FWCI
- 1.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Current Science (publishedVersion)
- The University of Malaya Research Repository (University of Malaya) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Learning Styles and Cognitive Differences
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Online Learning and Analytics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
- Keywords
- learning style identification, student learning behavior, Index of Learning Styles, Moodle, virtual learning environments, Java programming, correlation analysis, learning analytics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Predicting Learning Styles Based on Students’ Learning Behaviour Using Correlation Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.18520/cs/v113/i11/2090-2096
- The paper
- Xiao, L. L., & Abdul Rahman, S. S. B. (2017). Predicting Learning Styles Based on Students’ Learning Behaviour Using Correlation Analysis. Current Science. https://doi.org/10.18520/cs/v113/i11/2090-2096