Cited by 21

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Pre-Columbian Earthworks in the Riberalta Region of the Bolivian Amazon

Saunaluoma, Sanna·2010·Amazônica - Revista de Antropologia

Abstract

Interpretations of the Amazonia prehistory have changed significantly in the last few decades, as the complexity and diversity of the Amazonian cultures are beginning to be documented and understood. Earthworking, a long-term conscious anthropogenic landscape alteration, was a widespread phenomenon throughout the South American tropical lowlands. A variety of earthworks has been documented in the Southwest Amazon, including ditches and embankments of different shapes and sizes, roads, extensive raised fields, canals, causeways, and artificial wetlands linked to adjacent mounds and forest island settlement sites. A field survey and test excavations were undertaken in the region of Riberalta, in the Bolivian Amazon. The purpose of these investigations was to study the distribution and characteristics of the pre-Columbian occupation in the region. We found different types of sites, some without visible earthworks, indicating fairly dense occupation on river bluffs and terra firme, but lacking long permanence in the same location. The earthwork tradition prevailed in the Riberalta region from at least 100 B.C. until the period of European contact. The function of the less-complex earthworks may have been to enclose the occupation areas, and in some cases, to serve as canals. Compared to the variable layout of the sites, the ceramic assemblages of the region are relatively homogeneous. A central objective for future research will be to determine if the earthwork sites correlate with a single or multiple cultural traditions.Key-words: Southwest Amazonian archaeology, earthworks, ceramic traditions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.18542/amazonica.v2i1.347

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Legacies of prehistoric influence in Amazonia are visible from aerial surveys and satellite imagery along the southern periphery of the basin, particularly in the Llanos de Moxos of Bolivia, the geoglyph-rich region of Acre, Brazil and northern Bolivia, and the Upper Xingu in Brazil.

    “Legacies of prehistoric influence in Amazonia are visible from aerial surveys and satellite imagery along the southern periphery of the basin, particularly in the Llanos de Moxos of Bolivia (e.g. [1,12-14]), the geoglyph-rich region of Acre, Brazil and northern Bolivia [3,15-18], and the Upper Xingu in Brazil [2,19] (figure 1).”

    From Predicting pre-columbian anthropogenic soils in amazonia (2014) · cites this paper as [16]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 47

  1. Arnold, D. & K..Pret¬tol. 1988. Aborigi- nal earthworks near the mouth of the Beni, Bolivia. Journal of Field Archaeology 15(4):457-465.
  2. Balée, W. & C. Erickson (eds). 2006. Time and complexity in historical ecology. Studies in neotropical lowlands. New York: Colombia University Press.
  3. Calandra, H. & S. Salceda. 2004. Amazo- nia boliviana: arqueología de los Llanos de Mojos. Acta Amazonica 34 (2):155-163.
  4. Ph.D. Diss., Department of Anthropol- ogy, University of California at Berkeley. ____. 1966. The aboriginal cultural geography of the Llanos de Mojos of Bolivia. Berkeley: University of California Press. ____. 1996. A bluff model of riverine settlement in prehistoric Amazonia. An- nals of the Association of American Geographers 86(4):654-681.
  5. Díaz-Andren, M., S. Lucy, S. Babic & D. Edwards (eds.). 2005. The archaeology of iden- tity. Approaches to gender, age, status, ethnicity and religion. London & New York: Rout- ledge.
  6. Dias, O. 2006. As estruturas arqueológicas de terra no estado do Acre -Amazônia Ocidental, Brasil. Um caso de resiliência? in Estudos Contemporaneos de Arqueologia, Ed- ited by O. Dias, E. Carvalho & M. Zim- mermann, pp. 59-168. Palmas: Unitins, IAB.
  7. Dias, O. & E. Teixeira de Carvalho. 2008. As estruturas de terra na arqueologia do Acre, in Arqueologia da Amazônia Ocidental: Os Geoglifos do Acre. Edited by D. Schaan, A. Ranzi & M. Pärssinen, pp. 45-56. Belém: Editora Universitária Universidade Federal do Pará -UFPA; Rio Branco: Biblioteca da Floresta Ministra Marina Silva.
  8. Erickson, C. 1995. Archaeological per- spectives on ancient landscapes of the Lla- nos de Mojos in the Bolivian Amazonia, in Archaeology in the American Tropics: Current Analytical Methods and Applications. Edited by P. Stahl, pp. 66-95. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  9. ____. 2001. Precolombian roads of the Amazon. Expedition 43(2):21-30.
  10. ____. 2006. Domesticated landscapes of the Bolivian Amazon, in Time and complexity in historical ecology. Studies in Neotropical Low- lands. Edited by W. Balée & C. Erickson, pp. 237-278. New York: Colombia Univer- sity Press.
  11. Glaser, B. & W. Woods. 2004 (eds). Explo- ration in Amazonian Dark Earths. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
  12. Heckenberger, M. 2002. Rethinking the Arawakan diaspora: Hierarchy, regionality and the Amazonian formative, in Compara- tive Arawakan Histories: Rethinking Language Families and Culture Area in Amazonia. Ed- ited by J. Hill & F. Santos-Granero, pp. 99- 122. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
  13. Heckenberger, M. & E. Neves. 2009. Ama- zonian Archaeology. Annual Review of An- thropology 38: 251-266.
  14. Heckenberger, M., J. Petersen & E. Neves. 1999. Village size and permanence in Amazonia: Two archaeological examples from Brazil. Latin American Antiquity 10(4):353-376.
  15. Hill, J. & F. Santos-Granero (eds.). 2002. Comparative Arawakan Histories: Rethinking Language Families and Culture Area in Ama- zonia. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
  16. Korpisaari, A., J. Faldín, R. Kesseli, J. Ko- rhonen, S. Saunaluoma, A. Siiriäinen & M. Pärssinen. 2003. Informe preliminar de las investigaciones arqueológicas de la tem- porada 2002 en el sitio de La Fortaleza de Las Piedras, in Reports of the Finnish-Bolivian Archaeological Project in the Bolivian Amazon. Edited by A. Siiriäinen & A. Korpisaari, pp. 7-34. Helsinki: Department of Archae- ology, University of Helsinki.
  17. Lathrap, D., A. Gebhart-Sayer & A. Mes- ter. 1985. The roots of the Shipibo art Pre-columbian earthworks Amazônica 2 (1): 104-138, 2010 Federal Fluminense, Rio de Janeiro.
  18. Nordenskiöld, E. 1913. Urnengräber und Mounds im bolivianischen Flachland. Baessler-Archiv 3(6):205-255.
  19. Pärssinen, M., A. Ranzi, S. Saunaluoma & A. Siiriäinen. 2003. Geometrically pat- terned ancient earthworks in the Rio Bran- co region of Acre, Brazil: New evidence of ancient chiefdom formations in Ama- zonian interfluvial terra firme environment, in Western Amazonia -Amazônia Ocidental. Multidisciplinary Studies on Ancient Expan- sionistic Movements, Fortifications and Sedentary Life. Edited by M. Pärssinen & A. Kor- pisaari (eds.), pp. 97-133. Helsink: Renvall Institute Publications 14.
  20. Pärssinen, M., D. Schaan & A. Ranzi. 2009. Pre-Columbian geometric earth- works in the upper Purus: a complex society in Western Amazonia. Antiquity 83(322):1084-1095.
  21. Petersen J., E. Neves & M. Heckenberger. 2001. Gift from the past: terra preta and prehistoric Amerindian occupation in Amazonia, in Unknown Amazon: Culture in Nature in Ancient Brazil. Edited by C. McE- wan, C. Barreto & E. Neves, pp. 86-105. London: British Museum Press. style: Three waves on Imiríacocha of there were "Incas" before The Incas. Journal of Latin American Lore 11(1):31-119.
  22. by M. Díaz-Andren, S. Lucy, S. Babic & D. Edwards, pp. 86-109. London & New York: Routledge.
  23. McEwan, C., C. Barreto & E. Neves (eds). 2001. Unknown Amazon: Culture in Nature in Ancient Brazil. London: British Museum Press.
  24. Métraux, A. 1948. The Guarani, in The Tropical Forest Tribes. Handbook of South American Indians. Edited by J. Steward. Bureau of American Ethnology Bulle- tin 143(3):69-94.
  25. Myers, G., A. Newton & O. Melgarejo. 2000. The influence of canopy gap size on natural regeneration of Brazil nut (Ber- tholletia excelsa) in Bolivia. Forest Ecology and Management 127(1-3):119-128.
  26. Myers, T. 1988. Vision de la prehistoria de la Amazonia Superior, in I Seminario de Investigaciones Sociales en la Amazonia, pp. 37- 87. Iquitos, Peru: Editorial Ceta. ____. 2002. The Pacacocha and Cumancaya traditions at Yarinacocha, Peru. University of Nebraska State Museum. Unpublished report.
  27. Nícoli, I. 2000. Estudo de cerâmicas de sítios com estrutura de terra circulares do alto curso do rio Purus, por meio de métodos geoquímicos: Data- ção e caracterização. Ph.D. diss., Universidade Saunaluoma, S. Amazônica 2 (1): 104-138, 2010 Pre-columbian earthworks Amazônica 2 (1): 104-138, 2010
  28. Santos-Granero, F. 2002. The Arawakan matrix: Ethos, language, and history in native South America, in Comparative Ar- awakan Histories: Rethinking Language Fami- lies and Culture Area in Amazonia. Edited by J. Hill & F. Santos-Granero, pp. 25-50. Ur- bana: University of Illinois Press.
  29. Saunaluoma, S., J. Faldín, A. Korpisaari & A. Siiriäinen. 2002. Informe preliminar de las investigaciones arqueológicas en la región de Riberalta, Bolivia, in Reports of the Finnish-Bolivian archaeological project in the Bolivian Amazon. Edited by A. Siiriäinen & A. Korpisaari, vol. I, pp. 31-52. Helsinki: Department of Archaeology, University of Helsinki.
  30. Saunaluoma, S. & J. Korhonen. 2003. In- forme preliminar de las investigaciones arqueológicas realizadas en la región de Riberalta, Bolivia, en 2002, in Reports of the Finnish-Bolivian archaeological project in the Bolivian Amazon. Edited y A. Siiriäinen & A. Korpisaari, vol. II, pp. 55-71. Helsinki: Department of Archaeology, University of Helsinki.
  31. Schaan, D., A. Ranzi & M. Pärssinen (eds.). 2008. Arqueologia da Amazônia Ocidental: os geoglifos do Acre. Belém: Editora Universi- tária UFPA; Rio Branco: Biblioteca da Flo- resta Ministra Marina Silva.
  32. Siiriäinen, A. 2003. Towards the chronol- ogy of the Las Piedras fortress in the Bo- livian Amazon: Four radiocarbon datings, in Reports of the Finnish-Bolivian archaeological project in the Bolivian Amazon. Edited by A. Siiriäinen & A. Korpisaari (eds.). Vol. II, pp. 1-6. Helsinki: Department of Archae- ology, University of Helsinki.
  33. Siiriäinen, A. & A. Korpisaari (eds.). 2002. Reports of the Finnish-Bolivian archaeological project in the Bolivian Amazon, vol. I. Helsin- ki: Department of Archaeology, University of Helsinki.
  34. Siiriäinen, A., J. Faldín, M. Jalkanen-Mäkelä, A. Korpisaari & S. Saunaluoma. 2002. The fortress of Las Piedras in the Bolivian Ama- zon, in Reports of the Finnish-Bolivian Archaeo- logical Project in the Bolivian Amazon. Edited by A. Siiriäinen & A. Korpisaari (eds.), vol I, pp. 1-30. Helsinki: Department of Archaeology, University of Helsinki.
  35. Siiriäinen, A. & A. Korpisaari (eds.). 2003. Re- ports of the Finnish-Bolivian archaeological project in the Bolivian Amazon, vol. II. Helsinki: Depart- ment of Archaeology, University of Helsinki.
  36. Simões, M. & D. Lopes. 1987. Pesquisas ar- queológicas no baixo/médio Rio Madeira (AM). Revista de Arqueologia 4(1):117-134.
  37. Silverman, H. & W. Isbell (eds.). 2008. Handbook of South American Archaeology. New York: Springer.
  38. ____. (ed.). 1985. Archaeology in the American Tropics: Current analytical methods and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  39. Steward, J. (ed.). 1948. Handbook of South American Indians. Bureau of Ameri- can Ethnology Bulletin 143, Vol.
  40. Sullivan, L. (ed.). 2002. The native religion and cultures of Central and South America, Anthro- pology of the Sacred. New York: Continuum.
  41. Turner, T. 2002. The sacred as alienated social consciousness: Ritual and cosmol- ogy among the Kayapó, in The native religion and cultures of Central and South America, an- thropology of the sacred. Edited by L. Sullivan, pp. 278-298. New York: Continuum.
  42. Virtanen, P. 2008. Observacôes sobre as possíveis relacôes entre os sítios arque- ológicos de Acre e um povo Aruak con- temporâneo, in Arqueologia da Amazônia Ocidental: Os Geoglifos do Acre. Edited by D. Schaan, A. Ranzi & M. Pärssinen, pp. 120- 133. Belém: Editora Universitária UFPA.
  43. Walker, J. 2008b. Pre-Columbian ring ditches along the Yacuma and Rapulo Riv- ers, Beni, Bolivia: A preliminary review. Journal of Field Archaeology 33(4):1-15.
  44. Wasson, J-G., S. Barrera, B. Barrere, D. Bi- net, D. Collomb, I. Gonzales, F. Gourdin, J-L. Guyot & G. Rocabado. 2002. Hydro- ecoregions of the Bolivian Amazon: A geographical framework for the function- ing of river ecosystems, in The ecohydrology of South American rivers and wetlands. Edited by M. McClain, pp. 69-91. IAHS Special Publications n o . 6. Weber, R. 1975. Caimito: An analysis of the late prehistoric culture of the Central Ucayali, eastern Peru. Ph.D. Diss. Department of Anthropology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
  45. Woods, W., W. Teixeira, J. Lehmann, C. Steiner, A. WinklerPrins & L. Rebellato (eds.). 2009. Amazonian Dark Earths: Win Sombroek's view. Berlin: Springer.
  46. Wüst, I. & C. Barreto. 1999. The ring vil- lages of Central Brazil: A challenge for Amazonian Archaeology. Latin American Antiquity 10(1):3-23. Recebido em 16/12/2009. Aprovado em 26/02/2010.
  47. Saunaluoma, S. Amazônica 2 (1): 104-138, 2010

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Saunaluoma, S.
Venue
Amazônica - Revista de Antropologia
Published
2010-07-24
Volume
2
Issue
1
ISSN
1984-6215
Cited by
21
References
0

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review