The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Voicing the professional doctorate and the researching professional's identity: Theorizing the EdD's uniqueness
Open accessAbstract
Although there is increasing interest in how learning to become a researching professional is understood by students undertaking a professional doctorate of education (EdD), the topic remains under-researched and under-theorized. In this article, we provide a set of theorizations, starting with the purpose and distinctiveness of the professional doctorate and the researching professional identity as this is understood by students and staff participating in the EdD programme in one university in the United Kingdom (UK). This is followed by a retheorization of the researching professional as they develop a reflexive disposition to connect the workplace and the university as the subject and object of the same critical stance. We explore: how the professional doctorate may be understood as practices of diverse researching professionals at different phases and stages of their doctoral journey; the imperative of critical reflexivity as one moves from practitioner to researching professional; and the placing of 'practice' at the nexus of the workplace, the university (doctoral programme) and leading professional change. We conclude with a merging of theorizations building on the being and doing of reflexive practice by EdD doctoral educators/supervisors and doctoral students/researching professionals. Our theorizations are drawn from insights arising from recent EdD research projects (Burnard et al., 2016; Burnard et al., 2018; Heaton et al., forthcoming), and highlighted by narratives from two EdD students currently on a part-time EdD programme.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“if practitioner research has, in the past, had a troubled history in terms of its status within broader research communities, so too has the professional doctorate within its wider cadre of doctoral cousins (Burnard et al., 2018; Creaton, 2021; Lunt, 2018).”
From Power, positionality and practitioner research: Schoolteachers' experiences of professional doctorates in education (2023) · cites this paper as Burnard et al., 2018
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 29
- Baughan, J. (2004) 'Lessing and the "Sturm und Drang": A reappraisal revisited'. Modern Language Review, 99 (3), 827-8.
- Beijaard, D., Meijer, P.C. and Verloop, N. (2004) 'Reconsidering research on teachers' professional identity'. Teacher and Teaching Education, 20 (2), 107-28.
- Bourdieu, P. and Passeron, J.-C. (1994) 'Introduction: Language and relationship to language in the teaching situation'. In Bourdieu, P., Passeron, J.-C. and de Saint Martin, M. Academic Discourse: Linguistic misunderstanding and professorial power. Trans. Teese, R. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1-34.
- Bourner, T., Bowden, R. and Laing, S. (2001) 'Professional doctorates in England'. Studies in Higher Education, 26 (1), 65-83.
- Burnard, P., Holliday, C., Jasilek, S. and Nikolova, A. (2018) 'Artists and arts-based method use in higher education: A living inquiry of an academic programme in a faculty of education'. In Chemi, T. and Du, X. (eds) Arts-Based Methods and Organizational Learning: Higher education around the world. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 291-325.
- Drake, P. and Heath, L. (2011) Practitioner Research at Doctoral Level: Developing coherent research methodologies. London: Routledge.
- Gray, B. (2008) 'Putting emotion and reflexivity to work in researching migration'. Sociology, 42 (5), 935-52.
- Gronn, P. (2002) 'Distributed leadership as a unit of analysis'. Leadership Quarterly, 13 (4), 423-51.
- Hajer, M.A. (1995) The Politics of Environmental Discourse: Ecological modernization and the policy process. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
- Heaton, R., Burnard, P., Nikolova, A., Igglesden, T., Williams, D., Joomun, R., Peacock, F., Rogers, B. and Wong, S. (forthcoming) '(Re-)conceptualising doctoral education as a living autographic site for professionals'. International Journal of Education in the Arts.
- Neumann, R. (2005) 'Doctoral differences: Professional doctorates and PhDs compared'. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 27 (2), 173-88.
- Strauss, A. (1962) 'Transformations of identity'. In Rose, A.M. (ed.) Human Behaviour and Social Processes: An interactionist approach. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 63-85.
- Streitwieser, B. and Ogden, A.C. (eds) (2016) International Higher Education's Scholar-Practitioners: Bridging research and practice. Oxford: Symposium Books.
- Sultana, F. (2007) 'Reflexivity, positionality and participatory ethics: Negotiating fieldwork dilemmas in international research'. ACME: An International e-Journal for Critical Geographies, 6 (3), 374-85.
- Taylor, A. (2007) 'Learning to become researching professionals: The case of the doctorate of education'. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 19 (2), 154-66.
- Tennant, M. (2004) 'Doctoring the knowledge worker'. Studies in Continuing Education, 26 (3), 431-41.
- University of Cambridge (2018) 'Cambridge students: PhD, MSc, MLitt and MPhil by dissertation'. Online. www.cambridgestudents.cam.ac.uk/your-course/examinations/graduate-exam-information/writing- submitting-and-examination/phd-msc-mlitt (accessed 4 January 2018).
- Usher, R. (2002) 'A diversity of doctorates: Fitness for the knowledge economy?'. Higher Education Research and Development, 21 (2), 143-53.
- Weine, S. (2015) 'Applying multimethod and mixed methods to prevention research in global health'. In Hesse-Biber, S. and Johnson, R.B. (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Multimethod and Mixed Methods Research Inquiry. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 447-65.
- Wenger, E. (1998) Communities of Practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. The other articles in the 'EdD at 20' feature are:
- Bamberger, A. (2018) 'Academic degree recognition in a global era: The case of the doctorate of education (EdD) in Israel'. London Review of Education, 16 (1), 28-39.
- Chua, S.M.J. (2018) 'Being written: Thinking the normative in the EdD'. London Review of Education, 16 (1), 56-62.
- Cunningham, B. (2018) 'Pensive professionalism: The role of "required reflection" on a professional doctorate'. London Review of Education, 16 (1), 63-74.
- Hawkes, D. and Yerrabati, S. (2018) 'A systematic review of research on professional doctorates'. London Review of Education, 16 (1), 10-27.
- Hawkes, D., Yerrabati, S. and Taylor, S. (2018) Editorial: 'The EdD at 20: Lessons learned from professional doctorates'. London Review of Education, 16 (1), 1-3.
- Lunt, I. (2018) Introduction to 'The EdD at 20: Lessons learned from professional doctorates'. London Review of Education, 16 (1), 4-9.
- Moran, E. and Misra, D. (2018) 'Professional doctorates: A pathway to legitimacy for non-academic HE professionals?' London Review of Education, 16 (1), 75-89.
- Robinson, C. (2018) 'The landscape of professional doctorate provision in English higher education institutions: Inconsistencies, tensions and unsustainability'. London Review of Education, 16 (1), 90-103.
- Taylor, S. (2018) 'The UCL EdD: An apprenticeship for the future educational professional?' London Review of Education, 16 (1), 104-21.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Czerniawski, G. (2023) · British Educational Research Journal · doi:10.1002/berj.3902 · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Authors
- Burnard, P., Dragovic, T., Ottewell, K., & Lim, W. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Cambridge (GB)
- Venue
- London Review of Education
- Publisher
- UCL Press
- Published
- 2018
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 1474-8460 (ISSN-L)
- 1474-8479
- OpenAlex
- W2794743054
- Cited by
- 29
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5
- FWCI
- 6.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- London Review of Education (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- PEARL (University of Plymouth) (submittedVersion)
- Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Apollo (cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions
- Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
- Social Sciences › Education › Adult and Continuing Education Topics
- Keywords
- professional doctorate, EdD, critical reflexivity, reflexive practice, doctoral education, career change, doctoral supervision
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review